I know there are a lot of private conversations about this, but I'd like to
try, in the time frame of the next W3C TPAC and IETF meetings, to work out a
solution to the issue of forking the URL specifications. Does everyone know
what the issues are?
Is everyone willing to talk about solutions?
It's best to view RFC 2119 in the context of IETF rules for interoperability:
Progression along standards track depends on there being multiple independent
interoperable implementations of every feature.
While feature is not clearly defined, I believe that in a well-written
specification, any
Since raised on W3C TAG
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jan/0076.html:
I reviewed draft-abarth-mime-sniff. I'm not sure I found all of the past
discussion on the document, and I probably got some wrong, but it hasn't been
updated in quite a while.
I sent the review to
...@access-company.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:37 PM
To: Larry Masinter; Robin Berjon
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7)
Hi Larry,
WOW:
It's a pity you were not involved in the discussions around PC's version
attribute.
Thanks,
Marcin
]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 6:00 AM
To: Larry Masinter
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (2)
Dear Larry,
thank you for your comments.
On Oct 10, 2009, at 19:44 , Larry Masinter wrote:
2) ** WELL-DEFINED MAPPING TO FILES **
Section 4.4 Step 2
AM
To: Larry Masinter
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3)
Dear Larry,
thank you for your comments.
On Oct 10, 2009, at 19:44 , Larry Masinter wrote:
3) ** Reuse URI schemes **
http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-scheme includes Good practice
-Original Message-
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:ro...@berjon.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:08 AM
To: Larry Masinter
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7)
Dear Larry,
thank you for your comments.
On Oct 10, 2009, at 19:44 , Larry Masinter wrote
, 2009 6:13 AM
To: Larry Masinter
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (1)
Dear Larry,
thank you for your comments.
On Oct 10, 2009, at 19:44 , Larry Masinter wrote:
1) ** WELL DEFINED QUERY AND AUTHORITY **
http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-scheme points
I'll ask the TAG to review your responses at our F2F this week.
Sorry for the delay.
--
http://larry.masinter.net
-Original Message-
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:ro...@berjon.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 1:54 AM
To: Larry Masinter
Cc: public-webapps WG
Subject: Re: [public
I'm sorry for the confusion, my email was sent by mistake. I
have not re-reviewed the widget URI scheme since a previous
review several months ago. I was only reacting to something
in your email. I suppose I should re-review the widget URI
scheme document itself, but I haven't. My goal at the
(BCC original mailing lists, directing traffic to public-...@w3.org
for IRI issues.
There are no IRI schemes. I'm not sure that the draft makes
this clear, or makes clear that although most other parts of
the IRI syntax extend URI syntax, the scheme is the same, cannot
contain any %xx encoded
I didn't think widget had ever gone away.
The document you pointed at says:
This document is not a specification as of this time, though it is likely to
become one once consensus has been reached on its fundamental direction. In the
meantime, this document must be considered to sit outside
external
review for security mechanisms and assumptions is critical.
Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net
-Original Message-
From: Arve Bersvendsen [mailto:ar...@opera.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 9:55 AM
To: Larry Masinter; marc...@opera.com; public-pkg-uri-scheme; public-webapps
Subject
Caceres [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 5:27 AM
To: Larry Masinter
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann; public-pkg-uri-scheme; WebApps WG
Subject: Re: tag: uri scheme
Hi Larry,
2009/1/22 Larry Masinter l...@acm.org:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13986
and effective for the overall communication system.
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 7:04 PM
To: Larry Masinter
Cc: Marcos Caceres; public-pkg-uri-sch...@w3.org; public-webapps@w3.org; Tim
Kindberg
Subject: Re
generating correct ZIP files.
Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net
=
Larry Masinter wrote:
I'm not sure about 'authoring might be more complicated',
though. The author/sender/creator of a package has a lot more
insight about the types of the components of the package
than
scope) then perhaps you might want to respond more
quickly.
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 3:29 AM
To: Larry Masinter
Cc: Arthur Barstow; Jon Ferraiolo; Richard Cohn; Bill McCoy; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Michael Stahl
17 matches
Mail list logo
