Re: HTML editors meeting

2016-03-16 Thread Ms2ger
Hi Léonie, Please don't send spam about your HTML fork to this mailing list; we were promised the WG merge would not cause our time to be wasted with that crap. Thanks Ms2ger On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Léonie Watson <> wrote: > Hello, > > There will be

Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL Level 1; deadline December 9

2015-12-02 Thread Ms2ger
aised, this CfC will be > considered as passing and we will proceed with a CR publication. > I'd like to see the difference between this proposed CR and the latest editor's draft. Thanks Ms2ger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWXwo9AAoJEOXgvIL+s8n284QH/1Q1qBZW6Cg+HacdgWbCNhBj

Re: CfC: Is Web Workers Ready for CR? deadline Dec 14

2015-11-30 Thread Ms2ger
vide your thoughts on these questions by Dec 14 2015. If > there’s no interest from the members to continue the work of > WebWorkers in W3C, we will probably stop publishing new versions of > this spec. > Let's publish it as a REC; that no longer needs interop anyway (see: DOM4 is a REC). HTH Ms2ger

Re: [Web Components] proposing a f2f...

2015-10-28 Thread Ms2ger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/28/2015 05:19 AM, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: > it would be good to have a face to face meeting, [citation needed] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWMNsSAAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2c1YH/ji5YgPwZXMcIE2BDXpOfZ4G

Re: [XHR] Error type when setting request headers.

2015-09-29 Thread Ms2ger
is implies in particular that a TypeError will be thrown here. Indeed, the Firefox Nightly I'm running right now implements this behaviour. HTH Ms2ger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWCqLDAAoJEOXgvIL+s8n26GQH/RPt+Nxxnmg0BXfIOySWeunn 2FHMlGiydCT5eek7oLvMhH3o2wyfgExEJrQyc9/

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Ms2ger
document the > changes since the previous CR and to identify the "at risk” > features. > Why? What are you trying to achieve that makes doing that a good use of your time (and the time of everyone else in that toolchain)? Thanks Ms2ger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEB

Re: Tests for new shadow DOM API

2015-09-04 Thread Ms2ger
then create a new top-level directory > "shadow-dom"? We can then migrate or write new tests there. > If you believe a significant fraction of the existing tests is out of date with the specification, I'd suggest moving them all into `shadow-dom/untriaged` and adding a `REA

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

2015-09-01 Thread Ms2ger
Hi Yves, On 09/01/2015 11:30 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: > On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger <> wrote: >> On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: >>> In fact, I would prefer to have the editors’ copy published as >>> TR/WebIDL/, and let -1 -2 … -n

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

2015-08-31 Thread Ms2ger
plemented). > Who do you propose will construct such a "what is implemented" specification, and what useful work would you have them drop for it? Thanks Ms2ger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV5JkbAAoJEOXgvIL+s8n27aQH/jCaZRS6ONmC1aklZACK5Iep NV5VSxq1H2aHv6rdRiBNygeGzEiwENZ

Re: [Bug 27709] New: Dictionary MouseEventInit uses keyword attribute for its members

2015-01-13 Thread Ms2ger
to apply here Why shouldn't the attribute keyword be used? Answered in the bug. Ms2ger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUtVfpAAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2wQ8H/R08N6E9k1+mxoCrHbt5SfRG qJhm1e25I9wjsrSW/2fEdsOzaf3ydc6jFJiL6Z8deD1+88wAvFnOuvWh2pSeVJt4 q

Re: [Custom] Custom elements and ARIA

2014-08-28 Thread Ms2ger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/28/2014 01:42 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: TL;DR: we (Google) are trying to explain the platform with custom elements [citation needed] on explain the platform. - -- Ms2ger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT/tPwAAoJEOXgvIL

Re: gamepad

2014-04-28 Thread Ms2ger
this, and this Working Group has published a specification [1] for it. HTH Ms2ger [1]

[pointerlock] Various comments

2014-01-09 Thread Ms2ger
that is reported in |screenX/Y when the pointer is locked. The dfn-exitpointerlock id is on an empty dfn element, which seems pretty silly. HTH Ms2ger [1] [2]

Re: [testing] Common way to manage test bugs?

2013-12-19 Thread Ms2ger
and specification issues. * Cross-referencing commits/PRs with issues might also be useful. HTH Ms2ger

Objection to publishing DOM Parsing and Serialization (was Re: CfC: publish LCWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline December 3)

2013-12-06 Thread Ms2ger
. Even worse is the removal of the reference to the source specification, given that you know that this is a contentious subject in this WG. I therefore object to the publication of this specification in the current form. Ms2ger [1]

Re: LINK only in HEAD?

2013-11-28 Thread Ms2ger
precludes the author from using custom elements in HEAD. Except the HTML parser. Unknown elements imply /headbody. Feel free to use the Live DOM Viewer to confirm that. HTH Ms2ger [1]

Re: RfC: LCWD of API for Media Resources 1.0; deadline June 3

2013-04-11 Thread Ms2ger
are at. I'm pretty sure I've seen some much simpler API ideas come by. I wonder what happened to those. For reference: HTH Ms2ger

Re: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?

2013-02-19 Thread Ms2ger
group that will insist on imposing a more restrictive copyright on it. HTH Ms2ger

[IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange should have static functions

2013-01-21 Thread Ms2ger
tool can not be used as an excuse for an incorrect specification, and I doubt we could publish a Rec without this shortcoming being addressed. HTH Ms2ger [1] [2]

[IndexedDB] Event handlers

2013-01-21 Thread Ms2ger
Hi, The IDB specification still uses IDL like [TreatNonCallableAsNull] attribute Function? onsuccess; for its event handlers. Current practice is to use attribute EventHandler onsuccess; Please update the specification. Thanks, Ms2ger

[IndexedDB] Type of IDBRequest.source

2013-01-21 Thread Ms2ger
Hi, IDBRequest.source has type object in the IDL snippet, but the definition claims the attribute can return null. If this is the case, the type should be object?, as for all nullable types. HTH Ms2ger

[IndexedDB] Type of IDBRequest.readyState

2013-01-21 Thread Ms2ger
: EventTarget { // … readonly attribute IDBReadyState readyState; // … }; HTH Ms2ger

[IndexedDB] Type of IDBCursor.source

2013-01-21 Thread Ms2ger
Hi, IDBCursor.source is described as returning object. It would be better to return the union (IDBObjectStore or IDBIndex), to make it clear that that is what's intended. HTH Ms2ger

Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

2012-12-03 Thread Ms2ger
this WG and the WHATWG after the recent discussions about attribution, but changes like this make me lose confidence in the goals of the W3C Team and the chairs of this WG on this matter. I maintain my technical objections to the publication. HTH Ms2ger

Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

2012-12-02 Thread Ms2ger
doc. Please revert all those changes. Thank you Ms2ger

Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

2012-12-02 Thread Ms2ger
On 12/02/2012 01:38 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 12/1/12 3:34 PM, ext Ms2ger wrote: I object to this publication because of this change: For a couple of years now, if a spec proposed for publication in TR includes a normative reference that hahas

Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

2012-12-01 Thread Ms2ger
:// pushed with a misleading commit message. Thanks Ms2ger

Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

2012-11-26 Thread Ms2ger
a link to the source in the dl in the header. Thanks Ms2ger

Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2

2012-11-25 Thread Ms2ger
with the proposal. *sigh* Same objections as to the XHR WD. Ms2ger

Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

2012-11-22 Thread Ms2ger
and silence will be assumed to mean agreement with the proposal. I object unless the draft contains a clear pointer to the canonical spec on Ms2ger

Re: Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation

2012-11-16 Thread Ms2ger
I object to making such a change. On 11/16/2012 02:32 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: Before going to CR, I believe the [HTML] entry in the references section needs to be changed to reference an appropriate W3C specification. A present, it reference a non-W3C document. On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:17 AM,

Re: Call for Editor: URL spec

2012-11-06 Thread Ms2ger
On 11/06/2012 08:02 AM, Adam Barth wrote: Does the WebApps Working Group plan do either of these things? A) Put in technical effort to improve the specification Unlikely. B) License the fork in such a way as to let me merge improvements into my copy Definitely not. HTH Ms2ger

Re: [WebIDL] Interface object prototype and function object

2012-10-03 Thread Ms2ger
one of the few objects that use WebIDL-compliant bindings in Gecko.) HTH Ms2ger

Re: CfC: publish FPWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline Sept 11

2012-09-17 Thread Ms2ger
Hi Chaals, On 09/17/2012 04:47 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 21:57:00 +0200, Ms2ger wrote: On 09/04/2012 07:06 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: This is a Call for Consensus to publish a First Public Working Draft of the DOM Parsing and Serialization spec

Re: CfC: publish FPWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline Sept 11

2012-09-16 Thread Ms2ger
of this CfC. Given the standing W3C policy against forking specifications, I object to publishing this fork. Ms2ger

Re: Feedback on Quota Management API

2012-06-27 Thread Ms2ger
. How do you distinguish between 'MUST' and 'must' then? I agree the style is jarring, but maybe that can be fixed rather then completely removed. Specifications must not use RFC2119 keywords to mean anything else than the meaning RFC2119 assigns to those keywords. HTH Ms2ger

Re: [IndexedDB] Null argument for optionalParameters?

2012-06-26 Thread Ms2ger
and Jonas at least) that WebIDL treat null, undefined, not passed, and {} as exactly identical for optional dictionary arguments... This was fixed yesterday over in bug 16725; [1] see the spec. [2] HTH Ms2ger [1] [2]

Re: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12

2012-06-06 Thread Ms2ger
that have been suggested as people have looked at the draft more closely. I've been holding off submitting them to maintain a stable version. Shall I go ahead and submit the edited version? Please do; there's no point in holding off clear improvements. Thanks Ms2ger

Re: Push API draft uploaded

2012-05-24 Thread Ms2ger
send Push service messages to this webapp. should probably refer to |serviceUrl|, not |requestUrl|. A reference to DOM4 for the DOMError interface should probably be added. Also, the resolve a url cross-reference is broken. HTH Ms2ger

Re: Push API draft uploaded

2012-05-24 Thread Ms2ger
readyState, please have a look at the discussion at Finally, it appears that you removed [NoInterfaceObject] from NavigatorPush (where I believe it was correct), rather than from PushService. HTH Ms2ger

Re: DOMParser Errors Should Be Exceptions

2012-05-23 Thread Ms2ger
, jQuery looks for a parserror tag and re-raises an error when parsing XML[2]. In my view, the DOMParser should throw an exception, and not insert a partially unspecified parserror tag. Thoughts? Opera has reported this is not web-compatible. Ms2ger

Re: [admin] short-names and 1-liners for our 7 new FPWDs

2012-05-09 Thread Ms2ger
. Also, we already have a web in the part of the URL, so it seems unnecessary to add another web in the shortname. HTH Ms2ger

Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes = Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML

2012-05-01 Thread Ms2ger
not try to spec something more complex than invoking an algorithm in the HTML spec in DOMParsing. HTH Ms2ger

Warnings for old DOM specifications

2012-04-04 Thread Ms2ger
know if you have any comments. Thanks Ms2ger [1] Title: Warnings for old DOM specifications Warnings for old DOM specifications Specifications with a replacement DOM 2 Core DOM 2 Traversal and Range Document Status

[file-writer] WebIDL / References

2012-02-25 Thread Ms2ger
, not just Function. * Interfaces should not have [NoInterfaceObject] without a good reason. * FileException doesn't exist anymore; use DOMException. Also, the References section is severely out of date. HTH Ms2ger

[FileAPI] Various comments

2012-02-10 Thread Ms2ger
to DOM4. The URL specification is now at The Stream API reference has a broken link. HTH Ms2ger [1]

[clipboard] Event definition

2012-02-09 Thread Ms2ger
-file/tip/Overview.html#constructing-events. HTH Ms2ger

Re: CfC: Charter addition for Fullscreen API

2012-01-31 Thread Ms2ger
On 01/31/2012 05:04 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: Fullscreen API Support.

Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again

2012-01-24 Thread Ms2ger
On 01/24/2012 01:58 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: * Ms2ger wrote: The recent message to www-dom about DOM2HTML [1] made me realize that we still haven't added warnings to obsolete DOM specifications to hopefully avoid that people use them as a reference. If you want to say more than

Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again

2012-01-24 Thread Ms2ger
On 01/24/2012 08:33 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: The problem is that the proposal (as I understand it) is to insert something like: DOM2 (a REC) is obsolete. Use DOM4 (a work in progress). This addition is tantamount (by the reading of some) to demoting the status of DOM2 to a work in progress.

Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again

2012-01-23 Thread Ms2ger
no objections, I'll try to move this forward. Ms2ger [1]

Re: [XHR] responseType json

2012-01-06 Thread Ms2ger
On 01/06/2012 10:28 PM, Jarred Nicholls wrote: This is an editor's draft of a spec, it's not a recommendation, so it's hardly a violation of anything. With this kind of attitude, frankly, you shouldn't be implementing a spec. HTH Ms2ger

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of the old XHR(1); deadline December 8

2011-12-02 Thread Ms2ger
by December 8 at the latest. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal. Sure, as long as TR/XMLHttpRequest/ redirects to XHR2 and there is a clear link to it from the note. Ms2ger

Re: [DOM4] atomicity of DocumentFragment insertion

2011-10-29 Thread Ms2ger
On 10/29/2011 01:32 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: (cc'ing webapps as that's the proper list to discuss the DOM. Yes, it's confusing). It isn't, as noted in the SotD: HTH Ms2ger

[indexeddb] 'raises' statements in IDL

2011-10-28 Thread Ms2ger
Hi all, I noticed that the IDB spec still uses 'getraises' and 'raises' statements in the IDL code. These were removed in bug 13866 [1]. HTH Ms2ger [1]

Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of DOM 3 Events; deadline October 21

2011-10-21 Thread Ms2ger
to offer my help in editing the specification. Thanks Ms2ger [1] [2] [3] [4]

[FileAPI] Event handler IDL attributes

2011-10-01 Thread Ms2ger
Hi Jonas, Arun As described in bug 13433 [1], the type of event handler IDL attributes should be [TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function?. Could you change File API accordingly? Thanks Ms2ger [1]

Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events

2011-09-30 Thread Ms2ger
between the two of you, I think it would be pretty manageable. I'd be happy to help get you started. I repeat my objections to speccing this outside DOM4. I would, of course, welcome Olli or Adam to become co-editors if they would wish that. Ms2ger

Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG deliverables

2011-09-21 Thread Ms2ger
On 09/20/2011 11:27 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: with the Web Applications Working Group, which after six years has a XMLHttpRequest test suite consisting of nothing but There is a good chance a test suite for XMLHttpRequest will be placed around here and no XMLHttpRequest specification to show.

Re: RfC: how to organize the DOM specs [Was: CfC: publish new WD of DOM Core]

2011-08-11 Thread Ms2ger
DOM Core. Thank you for your thoughtful message Ms2ger [1]

Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes

2011-04-10 Thread Ms2ger
to implement that, certainly. -- Ms2ger