Re: W3C's version of XMLHttpRequest should be abandoned

2015-08-06 Thread Robin Berjon
) then you can simply keep pulling the LS and apply code that filters out what you don't want. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Exposing structured clone as an API?

2015-04-24 Thread Robin Berjon
? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: template namespace attribute proposal

2015-03-12 Thread Robin Berjon
-cased today. A lot of template-parsing logic is set up so that things work without special effort. Or even go the extra mile and just slurp all SVG elements into the HTML namespace. There are a few name clashes, but we ought to be able to iron those out. And ditto MathML. -- Robin Berjon - http

Re: publishing new WD of URL spec

2014-09-11 Thread Robin Berjon
of you to not feed this thread as it can't possibly lead anywhere useful. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of URL spec

2014-09-11 Thread Robin Berjon
be included in the SotD and in the big red box. So? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Proposal for a credential management API.

2014-08-01 Thread Robin Berjon
as needed, which shouldn't be a lot. We can work something out and come back to you with a solution to make this happen. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [editing] Leading with ContentEditable=Minimal

2014-06-30 Thread Robin Berjon
anything about contenteditable. Oh yeah, anything involving tracking, OT, or whatever temporal really, really can't use the markup as its model. I'm surprised ICE went that way, it must be terribly painful. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [editing] Leading with ContentEditable=Minimal

2014-06-26 Thread Robin Berjon
know if we want to mention MVC and other such things? Perhaps just the general sanity of not using your rendering view as your model :) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [editing] selection across editing host boundaries

2014-06-24 Thread Robin Berjon
a fun new challenge. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Editing with native UI

2014-06-24 Thread Robin Berjon
. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [editing] Leading with ContentEditable=Minimal

2014-06-24 Thread Robin Berjon
On 23/06/2014 18:25 , Julie Parent wrote: Well stated. I like contentEditable=cursor. Works for me. Should I just scare up a draft? It is likely to be a pretty short spec :) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Editing TF and list

2014-06-23 Thread Robin Berjon
. After that, though, all discussion ought to have been redirected there. Thanks! [0] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014AprJun/0842.html [1] http://w3c.github.io/editing-explainer/tf-charter.html -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

DIsjoint ranges (was: contentEditable=minimal)

2014-06-23 Thread Robin Berjon
On 06/06/2014 18:52 , Ryosuke Niwa wrote: On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:40 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote: On 05/06/2014 09:02 , Ryosuke Niwa wrote: I agree visual selection of bidirectional text is a problem worth solving but I don't think adding a generic multi-range selection support

Re: Composition, IME, etc.

2014-06-23 Thread Robin Berjon
On 06/06/2014 19:13 , Ryosuke Niwa wrote: On Jun 6, 2014, at 7:24 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote: In order to handle them you have two basic options: a) Let the browser handle them for you (possibly calling up some platform functionality). This works as closely to user expectations

Re: [editing] selection across editing host boundaries

2014-06-23 Thread Robin Berjon
am not subscribed to the list, if anybody is interested and wants to reply or has further questions, I'd be grateful if you could CC me. Maybe you'll be interested in signing up to the new public-editing-tf list which has much lower traffic. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com

Editing with native UI (was: [editing] CommandQuery Object and Event)

2014-06-23 Thread Robin Berjon
atop custom editing is really a solution for breakage. We can also make it smart and able to tap into higher-level intention events such as knowing the platform's localised shortcut for a given action. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [editing] CommandEvent and contentEditable=minimal Explainer

2014-06-23 Thread Robin Berjon
it. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [editing] Leading with ContentEditable=Minimal

2014-06-23 Thread Robin Berjon
(and I certainly won't argue bikeshedding :). -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: impact of new gTLDs

2014-06-12 Thread Robin Berjon
the appearance of new gTLDs has on software implementation. The continued growth of https://publicsuffix.org/ would be annoying. Can you think of an alternative? Because it's looking like we're going to keep getting a lot of new TLDs. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [editing] CommandEvent and contentEditable=minimal Explainer

2014-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
, can you really rely on the browser to DTRT for the cases you don't wish to handle? Won't you end up having to use a library anyway? Again, I'm all for the simplicity; I'm just worried about the snoring dragon. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: CommandEvent for user intentions

2014-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
. Do you ever need a select-all event? I would think that a selection change event that happens to give you a selection object containing everything might suffice? (Which sort of seems to be what you're saying here — hence checking where you stand.) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
operations to a multi-range selection is a nightmare. I don't disagree that it can be hard to handle, but I'm not sure that that's indicative of anything. Most scripts only handle one selection because AFAIK only Gecko ever supported more than one. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
On 02/06/2014 23:01 , Ben Peters wrote: From: Robin Berjon [mailto:ro...@w3.org] I think that the latter is better because it gives the library the computed range that matches the operation, which as far as I can imagine is what you actually want to check (e.g. check that the newRange does

Re: Should minimal contentEditable default text input

2014-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
attribute? Just a DOM API perhaps as you're not going to get far without scripting anyway? I prefer it to be possible to say [contentEditable] { outline: dotted 1px; }. There's :read-write but it also matches input/textarea. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Should minimal contentEditable default text input

2014-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
the attribute name and giving it a value that triggers new behaviour doesn't bring in the complications, but it does give us a relatively clean syntax entry point. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Composition, IME, etc. (was: contentEditable=minimal)

2014-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
On 05/06/2014 09:09 , Ryosuke Niwa wrote: On May 23, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote: Semantically, autocorrect and compositing really are the same thing. They are not. Word substations and input method compositions are semantically different operations. Ok, I'll accept

Re: [editing] CommandQuery Object and Event

2014-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
then, but the v1 of this project should IMHO really, really not do more than what's needed for a script to cleanly implement an arbitrary text editor. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Minutes Editing discussion 2014-06-06

2014-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
an Editing TF [recorded in [13]http://www.w3.org/2014/06/06-webapps-minutes.html#action01] trackbot Created ACTION-731 - Create an editing tf [on Robin Berjon - due 2014-06-13]. BenjamP: we need a normative spec ... as well as updates to the explainer ... without cE, we need Command

Re: HTML imports: new XSS hole?

2014-06-03 Thread Robin Berjon
. So I would say there's a risk, but not a huge one. That said, I still prefer Simon's approach. PS: I've been wondering if adding an HTML sanitiser to the platform might make sense. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-27 Thread Robin Berjon
On 27/05/2014 01:47 , Ben Peters wrote: -Original Message- From: Robin Berjon On 26/05/2014 05:43 , Norbert Lindenberg wrote: Were any speakers of bidirectional languages in the room when this was discussed? I don't know what languages the others speak. That said, my recollection

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-27 Thread Robin Berjon
Hi Ben, On 27/05/2014 02:07 , Ben Peters wrote: From: Robin Berjon [mailto:ro...@w3.org] Even without accounting for touch screens, you really want the platform to be the thing that knows what Ctrl-Shift-Left means so you don't have to support it yourself (and get it wrong often). Agree. One

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-27 Thread Robin Berjon
script. In that sense an unselectable attribute would make sense. (I reckon that setting the widget to be cE=false would have the same effect, but it is nevertheless an orthogonal property.) WDYT? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Composition events (was: contentEditable=minimal)

2014-05-27 Thread Robin Berjon
in the Gist was not the latest I had and had a lot of TODO bits — I've udpated it to the latest. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-27 Thread Robin Berjon
On 27/05/2014 01:52 , Ben Peters wrote: From: Robin Berjon [mailto:ro...@w3.org] On 23/05/2014 01:23 , Ben Peters wrote: As I said I am unsure that the way in which composition events are described in DOM 3 Events is perfect, but that's only because I haven't used them in anger and they aren't

contentEditable and forms (was: contentEditable=minimal)

2014-05-27 Thread Robin Berjon
of any element contribute to the form data set. Thoughts? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-26 Thread Robin Berjon
On 26/05/2014 05:43 , Norbert Lindenberg wrote: On May 23, 2014, at 5:19 , Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote: Which brings me to think: when we discussed this at the Summit, there was some agreement (between all four of us :) that it was a good idea to support multi-range selections

Re: Should minimal contentEditable default text input

2014-05-26 Thread Robin Berjon
. Range.prototype.style seems complex in the context of overlapping ranges and such. Suddenly you're no longer applying CSS to a tree. So, since Gecko supports that, do you know how it's done? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-23 Thread Robin Berjon
. This would be the corollary to execComamnd(insertText), and the data would be the ñ that is about to be inserted. But if you only get one event you can't render the composition as it is carrying out. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Should minimal contentEditable default text input (was: contentEditable=minimal)

2014-05-23 Thread Robin Berjon
unsure how to best handle here — see comments). Please review the code so that we have an idea for a baseline of what we'd like to get at the end. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-23 Thread Robin Berjon
thinking of? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-23 Thread Robin Berjon
styling ranges which would allow them to keep a simpler DOM. It would actually be pretty awesome. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [clipboard events] click-to-copy support could be hasFeature discoverable?

2014-05-23 Thread Robin Berjon
On 23/05/2014 14:33 , James Greene wrote: I'm all in favor of a new API as well. Me too, as discussed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JanMar/0550.html. I wouldn't put this on window though; why not put it on Selection? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-22 Thread Robin Berjon
) to the application that matters. It makes for a pretty short spec — the previous paragraph is more than enough ;) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-22 Thread Robin Berjon
to handle the text mutation relatively simple, even when handling composition, then I think we should leave it up to the page. I think that we can make it reasonably easy to handle composition by using composition events. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: contentEditable=minimal

2014-05-12 Thread Robin Berjon
are guaranteed to mess things up). This is probably acceptable at this level, libraries can make it easier. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [Editing] Splitting Selection API Into a Separate Specification

2014-03-17 Thread Robin Berjon
much it would actually help. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Publishing a new WD of Clipboard API and events spec

2014-02-28 Thread Robin Berjon
object (or maybe Range), define it as doing whatever the browser does when the copy operation is invoke with that given selection, and ship. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: File API | lastModified and Date attribute change

2013-12-03 Thread Robin Berjon
so +1. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: LINK only in HEAD?

2013-12-02 Thread Robin Berjon
is relatively common); but it's likely worth checking the result. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Making selectors first-class citizens

2013-09-11 Thread Robin Berjon
://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/ false in both Firefox and Chrome. See http://caniuse.com/#search=matches. You do get mozMatchesSelector (and variants) in there. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Making selectors first-class citizens

2013-09-11 Thread Robin Berjon
of fish. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18

2013-06-24 Thread Robin Berjon
feature, where as templating is more of a common description for a development pattern. I think that makes sense; I've made the change. Feel free to tell me I'm nuts =-). I reckon you are, but for different reasons altogether ;) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18

2013-06-24 Thread Robin Berjon
into an algorithm which selects the foster parent. As it is right now, it's not clear whether the steps apply in order or not (if they apply in order, I think they might be wrong). I agree, but I reckon that's a separate issue. Do you mind filing a bug? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML

2013-06-17 Thread Robin Berjon
On 14/06/2013 19:26 , Ian Hickson wrote: On Fri, 14 Jun 2013, Dirk Schulze wrote: On Jun 14, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote: now that template is in HTML, I was wondering if some of the other specs needed the same treatment. Some of the specs can be relevant for other

Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18

2013-06-14 Thread Robin Berjon
with the integration with a fine tooth comb (using the diffs to find where various parts ended up in the spec if needed) and check that I didn't break anything. Templates are a wicked cool brick, thanks! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML

2013-06-14 Thread Robin Berjon
the monkey patching alone (a bit painful)? Just import the monkey patching into HTML, remove it from that spec, and have HTML refer to CE? Bring everything in? Imports: This one monkey patches a lot. I reckon it's best to import (ha!) it. WDYT? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com

Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML

2013-06-14 Thread Robin Berjon
to implement. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online

2013-06-06 Thread Robin Berjon
On 06/06/2013 15:08 , Johannes Wilm wrote: This used to work some days ago: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/editing/raw-file/tip/editing.htm You're missing an l at the end of your link... -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec

2013-05-13 Thread Robin Berjon
to see happen. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: jar protocol

2013-05-10 Thread Robin Berjon
On 10/05/2013 03:23 , Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote: On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: How do you figure out media types? Is it just sniffing, or do you have some sort of file extensions mapping as well

Re: jar protocol

2013-05-10 Thread Robin Berjon
with the information telling it to look in the bundle. That means it would return the bundle several times. Definitely a loss. Or did I misunderstand what you had in mind? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: jar protocol

2013-05-10 Thread Robin Berjon
wasted resources. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: jar protocol

2013-05-09 Thread Robin Berjon
past critical mass there would be too many nobody noticed the fallback is not working until now cases, so that seems rather uninteresting in the longer term. It's valuable in order to get to the critical mass. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: jar protocol

2013-05-09 Thread Robin Berjon
extensions mapping as well? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: jar protocol

2013-05-09 Thread Robin Berjon
On 08/05/2013 01:39 , Glenn Maynard wrote: On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org mailto:ro...@w3.org wrote: Have you looked at just reusing JAR for this (given that you support it in some form already)? I wonder how well it works. Off the top of my head I see

Re: jar protocol

2013-05-09 Thread Robin Berjon
On 07/05/2013 22:31 , David Sheets wrote: On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote: WDYT? This is really cool! Glad you like it :) Most servers already contain support for this in the form of index files. If you do link rel=bundle href=bundle.wrap/ / and set

jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)

2013-05-07 Thread Robin Berjon
). This means no URL scheme to be supported by everyone, no nested URL scheme the way JAR does it (which is quite distasteful), no messing with escaping ! in paths, etc. WDYT? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: ZIP archive API?

2013-05-06 Thread Robin Berjon
. Without boiling the ocean, adding support for a streamable format (which I don't think needs be more complex than tar) would be a big plus. * Captain Obvious to the rescue! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: ZIP archive API?

2013-05-03 Thread Robin Berjon
pushed off to a CG. It's not experimental in nature. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names

2013-04-23 Thread Robin Berjon
. The point is to get some eyeballs that aren't the author's to look at the tests before they go in; whatever process makes that happen is good so long as it does not involve bureaucracy. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names

2013-04-23 Thread Robin Berjon
differently, I think it can be a lot less boring if you're getting something out of it. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names

2013-04-22 Thread Robin Berjon
for regular contributions. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Move to GitHub: step 1 completed

2013-04-04 Thread Robin Berjon
removed the widgets tests. It's a great test suite, but widgets don't seem to be part of the web platform today, and so they shouldn't be in there. I'm going to sunset the hg repository by making it read only as soon as I can remember how that works. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com

Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started

2013-04-04 Thread Robin Berjon
On 04/04/2013 15:41 , Simon Pieters wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:50:53 +0200, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote: On 29/03/2013 21:08 , Jonas Sicking wrote: * Cache both files (poor bandwidth) * We could enable some way of flagging which context different URLs are expected to be used

Reviewing test submissions

2013-04-04 Thread Robin Berjon
-tests/pulls Let's party! A big thanks to Ms2ger and Odin for helping a lot with cleaning up the moved repo! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Reviewing test submissions

2013-04-04 Thread Robin Berjon
satisfactory and appreciated, Glad you like it :) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Reviewing test submissions

2013-04-04 Thread Robin Berjon
On 04/04/2013 17:59 , Arthur Barstow wrote: On 4/4/13 10:23 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: after having moved the test suite to the GitHub repository, we've been busy cleaning things up. Can the mirroring to http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/ be more frequent than every 10 minutes

Re: fixing appcache...

2013-04-03 Thread Robin Berjon
' and friends. There are a few slightly tricky bits to handle, but nothing insurmountable. This sort of stuff has been a small blip on the radar for essentially ever but if there's enough implementer interest it could be brought alive. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started

2013-04-03 Thread Robin Berjon
of the form { video/webm: kittens.webm, video/evil: dead-kittens.mv4 } that would operate in a manner modelled on source, caching only what's needed. It's a bit verbose, but it's a lot less verbose than loading the content twice. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: CfC: move WebApps' test suites to Github; deadline March 22

2013-03-18 Thread Robin Berjon
On 18/03/2013 15:54 , Dimitri Glazkov wrote: I am a big fan. Yeah, I kinda like the idea as well. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?

2013-02-19 Thread Robin Berjon
you're all happy with it, and the HTML people too. I reckon it could work though. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Fwd: [Bug 20945] New: Specs in dvcs have mixed-content stylesheets

2013-02-11 Thread Robin Berjon
https but uses a stylesheet served over http. This does not work in Chrome and will soon stop working in Firefox (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=834836). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front

2013-02-06 Thread Robin Berjon
. As it happens, they're working on a security model, too. This is not to say that declaring required privileges cannot be useful. There certainly are cases in which it can integrate into a larger system. But that larger system isn't upfront prompting. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Allow ... centralized dialog up front

2013-02-05 Thread Robin Berjon
. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [admin] If you use `respec`, your ED may be broken

2013-02-04 Thread Robin Berjon
On 31/01/2013 01:27 , Glenn Adams wrote: btw, it seems that Robin hasn't updated the generated copyright to include Beihang Which will happen before the end of the grace period. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub

2013-02-04 Thread Robin Berjon
. It's metadata but with usability taken into account. What is the expectation for what I will characterize as legacy specs like Marcos' widget test suites? Marcos? I would say: whoever wants to include their stuff can include it, so long as it's legit content related to a spec. -- Robin

Re: Updated idlharness.js

2013-01-24 Thread Robin Berjon
. (In webidl2.js that is, not idlharness.js). -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub

2013-01-23 Thread Robin Berjon
belabouring my point because I'm this close to using the word agile. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub

2013-01-23 Thread Robin Berjon
the existing framework after the GitHub move, and it would still have the same problems if we don't move. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Updated idlharness.js

2013-01-23 Thread Robin Berjon
branch. Thanks! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub

2013-01-22 Thread Robin Berjon
-to-split repository issue is not that important compared to having the tests at GitHub in the first place :-) Agreed. But how about we start with just one repo and then split them into several if it's a problem? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub

2013-01-22 Thread Robin Berjon
as the individual specs. We can keep on adding more specs in there (the Web Crypto people are looking to do that). -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Proposal: moving tests to GitHub

2013-01-22 Thread Robin Berjon
On 22/01/2013 17:14 , Tobie Langel wrote: On 1/22/13 4:45 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote: You *do* need to make the proper commitments for the test suite, but those are much lighter and can easily be extended to all. Moving to GitHub should be an excellent occasion to revisit how the CLA

Re: Review of the template spec

2012-12-13 Thread Robin Berjon
. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [XHR] Setting the User-Agent header

2012-09-06 Thread Robin Berjon
themselves in UA, by appending a token to the browser's UA (the header is a list of product tokens). As it is, they have to use a separate header. Do you have a use case that does not involve the vanity of the library's authors? :) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: IndexedDB and RegEx search

2012-08-09 Thread Robin Berjon
well worth looking at. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: [IndexedDB] Problems unprefixing IndexedDB

2012-08-09 Thread Robin Berjon
to have to :). It might be useful to emit a warning upon the first usage of an experimental interface, of the kind You are using WormholeTeleportation which is an experimental API and may change radically at any time. You have been warned. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Lazy Blob

2012-08-07 Thread Robin Berjon
make more sense to me to make the changes directly to the relevant specs, namely FileAPI and XHR. I've copied Anne, Arun, and Jonas — any thought? In either case, I'm happy to provide the content. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Re: Lazy Blob

2012-08-06 Thread Robin Berjon
On Aug 2, 2012, at 14:51 , Tobie Langel wrote: On 8/2/12 2:29 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote: On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:45 , Tobie Langel wrote: On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote: Can we please stop saying lazy blob? It's a confused and confusing phrase. Blobs

Re: Lazy Blob

2012-08-06 Thread Robin Berjon
imagination in just the right way I can conceive of a situation in which only telnet is available and HTTP isn't. So if you do have a use case, by all means please share it. If not, I maintain that you simply have no grounds for objection. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

  1   2   3   4   5   >