Re: [DOM4] Question about using sequenceT v.s., NodeList for

2012-03-19 Thread Vincent Hardy
is fine. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Vincent Hardy vha...@adobe.commailto:vha...@adobe.com wrote: On Mar 16, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:59:48 +0100, Vincent Hardy vha...@adobe.commailto:vha...@adobe.com wrote: b. Use sequenceT everywhere except where T

Re: [DOM4] Question about using sequenceT v.s., NodeList for

2012-03-16 Thread Vincent Hardy
On Mar 16, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:59:48 +0100, Vincent Hardy vha...@adobe.commailto:vha...@adobe.com wrote: b. Use sequenceT everywhere except where T=Node, in which case we would use NodeList. This is consistent with DOM4 and inconsistent within

[DOM4] Question about using sequenceT v.s., NodeList for (was [DOM4] NodeList should be deprecated )

2012-03-15 Thread Vincent Hardy
Hello, I am working on a proposal (http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-regions/css-om) to update the CSS Regions CSS OM APIs, and one of the changes is to make various lists static. I see that the thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/1068.html stemmed from the

FW: Question about the ProgressEvent implementation status

2011-12-08 Thread Vincent Hardy
Dec 2011 03:52:15 +0100, Vincent Hardy vha...@adobe.commailto:vha...@adobe.com wrote: Since you are the editors of the ProgressEvent spec, I thought you might be able to help us understand the implementation/adoption status. I'd prefer if you asked this on a public list next time so everyone can