responses are fine too).
-Art Barstow
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/sum10#webappstorage
On 11/21/11 2:14 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 11/20/11 8:33 PM, ext ashok malhotra wrote:
The idea is not to remove APIs.
We have several client-side storage facilities that cover different
The idea is not to remove APIs.
We have several client-side storage facilities that cover different but
overlapping
usecases. Can we step back and look at what we have and come up, perhaps, with
a
smaller set of facilities and better coordinated APIs.
All the best, Ashok
On 11/20/2011 3:42
But we should give it a try, no?
The spec are still Working Drafts.
All the best, Ashok
On 11/15/2011 2:47 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
These APIs are quite widely used on the web. It seems unlikely that
we'll be able to delete either of them in favor of a single facility.
Adam
On Tue, Nov 15,
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed below are mine and may not reflect the
opinions of
my employer or the W3C TAG
Comments:
o One use of local storage might be to store personal preferences, such as
travel
preferences or personal information such as medical history. In such cases,
you may
At the TAG f2f meeting last week we discussed the Web Storage
(http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/) draft. As you know, Web Storage provides
storage mechanisms (local storage and session storage) by origin. This led us
to conclude that it supports the same-origin policy. But section 6.1
Thanks, Marcos! We will discuss this at the TAG mtg next week.
All the best, Ashok
Marcos Caceres wrote:
(The following is my personal opinion about widgets)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:58 PM, ashok malhotra
ashok.malho...@oracle.com wrote:
John Kemp has kindly created A Taxonomy of Web
John Kemp has kindly created A Taxonomy of Web Applications for the TAG.
See
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/03/web-apps-taxonomy/web-apps-taxonomy.html
It would be good if some of the WebApps folks could review and comment.
Also, I suspect that behind the many documents that the Web Apps WG
