On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Marcos Caceresmarc...@opera.com wrote:
Simon Pieters wrote:
I've now run a check on the schema based on the tests and it seems to
be correct. I'd appreciate review!
I believe RNC should be served as application/relax-ng-compact-syntax
rather than
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Robin Berjonro...@berjon.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2009, at 15:58 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
As we have partitioned the PC spec into multiple specs, the RelaxNG
schema is no longer complete (e.g., excludes updates and warp). I suggest we
rip the relax NG schema out
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of the DOM 3 Events
spec:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
Dear,
Very interesting part of the whole Widget Sorcery
Here are few comments
1) In the same spirit as WARP, it would be interesting to make HTML5
reference, an informative one
2) Probably the link between authority and opaque-autorithy should be clearer
3) Update reference to Working Draft
Hi Robin,
Sorry for disturbing : there is a bunch of space problem in the spec :
probably it is only depending on your build process
For example :
* ASTERISK (*)character
* Path Language (XPath)Version 1.0
* Steve DeRoseW3C Recommendation
Reference
* probably you should consider referencing RFC
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Here's an API that might work:
The following methods are added to the Document, Element and
DocumentFragment interfaces:
addAttributeChangedListener(NodeDataCallback);
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:37 AM, mozer xmli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Here's an API that might work:
The following methods are added to the Document
Dear,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
Hi,
a) the UA has somehow allowed me to pick which instance I run, I get back
what I put for the right instance
b) the UA has become confused, I get both values, or something broken, or
nothing
c) the UA has a
well I wonder why this regex disallow all multiple of 10
signature10.xml is not possible any more
Xmlizer
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Frederick Hirsch
frederick.hir...@nokia.com wrote:
I see, perhaps we can combine the text I proposed with a variant on the bnf
you mentioned;
