Cameron McCormack: > It is probably not feasible to add to
HTMLCollection, because it has a
named property getter which is not [OverrideBuiltins]. That means that
all the new properties on the prototype like "concat", "push", etc.
would begin to shadow any named elements on the collection.
On
Anne van Kesteren: > Okay, annotated NodeList with [ArrayClass]. What
about HTMLCollection?
Should I add it there too? Could you take a look at NodeList and
HTMLCollection for accuracy?
It is probably not feasible to add to HTMLCollection, because it has a
named property getter which is not [O
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:03:23 +0100, Cameron McCormack
> wrote:
>
>> Anne van Kesteren:
>>
>>> Wasn't there a compatibility constrain with doing that?
>>>
>>
>> I don't remember -- the only difference it would make is that
>> Object.getP
Hello,
I am working on a proposal (http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-regions/css-om) to
update the CSS Regions CSS OM APIs, and one of the changes is to make various
lists static. I see that the thread at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/1068.html stemmed
from the CS
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:03:23 +0100, Cameron McCormack
wrote:
Anne van Kesteren:
Wasn't there a compatibility constrain with doing that?
I don't remember -- the only difference it would make is that
Object.getPrototypeOf(NodeList.prototype) == Array.prototype.
Okay, annotated NodeList wit
Anne van Kesteren:
Wasn't there a compatibility constrain with doing that?
I don't remember -- the only difference it would make is that
Object.getPrototypeOf(NodeList.prototype) == Array.prototype.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:44:16 +0100, Cameron McCormack
wrote:
Ojan Vafai:
We should make static NodeList inherit from Array though so that you can
do regular array operations on it.
Web IDL has the means to make (all) NodeList objects inherit from Array
by annotating them with [ArrayClass],
Ojan Vafai:
We should make static NodeList inherit from Array though so that you can
do regular array operations on it.
Web IDL has the means to make (all) NodeList objects inherit from Array
by annotating them with [ArrayClass], if we want to do that.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> Upon further thought, I take this suggestion back. Static NodeList as it
> currently exists is just an underpowered array, but that doesn't mean
> that's what it always has to be. In the future, we should add methods to
> NodeList that operate
Upon further thought, I take this suggestion back. Static NodeList as it
currently exists is just an underpowered array, but that doesn't mean
that's what it always has to be. In the future, we should add methods to
NodeList that operate on Nodes, e.g. add a remove method to NodeList that
call remo
On Mar 13, 2012, at 4:29 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:06:00 +0100, Rick Waldron
> wrote:
>> On Mar 12, 2012, at 3:06 PM, "Anne van Kesteren" wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:07:31 +0100, Rick Waldron
>>> wrote:
The NodeList item() method is a blocker.
>>>
>
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:06:00 +0100, Rick Waldron
wrote:
On Mar 12, 2012, at 3:06 PM, "Anne van Kesteren"
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:07:31 +0100, Rick Waldron
wrote:
The NodeList item() method is a blocker.
Blocker in what way?
As I've always understood it - the item() method is wha
On Mar 12, 2012, at 3:06 PM, "Anne van Kesteren" wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:07:31 +0100, Rick Waldron
> wrote:
>> The NodeList item() method is a blocker.
>
> Blocker in what way?
As I've always understood it - the item() method is what differentiates
NodeList from Array and blocks it f
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:07:31 +0100, Rick Waldron
wrote:
The NodeList item() method is a blocker.
Blocker in what way?
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Adam Klein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:24:45 +0100, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>>
>>> Dynamic NodeLists have a significant memory and performance cost. Static
>>> NodeLists are basically just under-powered
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:24:45 +0100, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>
>> Dynamic NodeLists have a significant memory and performance cost. Static
>> NodeLists are basically just under-powered arrays. We should just return
>> Node arrays from any new
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:24:45 +0100, Ojan Vafai wrote:
Dynamic NodeLists have a significant memory and performance cost. Static
NodeLists are basically just under-powered arrays. We should just return
Node arrays from any new APIs that return a list of Nodes. I'd like to
see NodeList get simila
Dynamic NodeLists have a significant memory and performance cost. Static
NodeLists are basically just under-powered arrays. We should just return
Node arrays from any new APIs that return a list of Nodes. I'd like to see
NodeList get similar treatment to hasFeature, i.e. a note that it not be
used
18 matches
Mail list logo
