On 02/18/2015 08:59 AM, David Leon Gil wrote:
> W.r.t. WebCrypto-Next:
>
> It would be wonderful to see a few useful algorithms added to the spec:
>
> - a modern VOF (e.g., SHAKE256)
> - a fast hash function (e.g., BLAKE2b)
> - a sequential-hard KDF (e.g., scrypt)
> - some non-NSA curves
New a
On 2015-02-18 08:59, David Leon Gil wrote:
W.r.t. WebCrypto-Next:
It would be wonderful to see a few useful algorithms added to the spec:
- a modern VOF (e.g., SHAKE256)
- a fast hash function (e.g., BLAKE2b)
- a sequential-hard KDF (e.g., scrypt)
- some non-NSA curves
as well as a slightly hi
W.r.t. WebCrypto-Next:
It would be wonderful to see a few useful algorithms added to the spec:
- a modern VOF (e.g., SHAKE256)
- a fast hash function (e.g., BLAKE2b)
- a sequential-hard KDF (e.g., scrypt)
- some non-NSA curves
as well as a slightly higher-level interface that makes it less
compl
As you probably noted, all proposals related to
http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/webcrypto-next-workshop/
were shot down.
Are we waiting on something, and if so is the case, exactly what?
Is the idea of building on an already semi-established solution like Chrome
Native Messaging unacceptable?