On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> One more thing. I think it's nice to have a new comprehensive list of use
> cases participants have come up over the years on the same document since
> the wiki page is quite outdated.
>
I spent the last couple of weeks working on this. Here
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> So instead, I decided to start summarizing the contentious bits of the
> current Shadow DOM spec:
> https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/wiki/Shadow-DOM:-Contentious-Bits
This is really great Dimitri, thanks. All the pointers to past
discu
One more thing. I think it's nice to have a new comprehensive list of use cases
participants have come up over the years on the same document since the wiki
page is quite outdated.
- R. Niwa
> On Feb 8, 2015, at 10:14 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
> Hi Dimitri,
>
> Thanks for writing up that pag
Hi Dimitri,
Thanks for writing up that page. I think it's valuable to have some
documentation like this since the discussion has been scatters across many
threads and a long time span.
Another point of contention appears to be how show isolation is done
particularly in the world where we've s
Folks,
I wrote a long email, replying to each point where I agreed/differed with
Ryosuke, and then deleted it, realizing I wasn't being productive.
So instead, I decided to start summarizing the contentious bits of the
current Shadow DOM spec:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/wiki/Shadow-DOM:
