CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Server-Sent Events; deadline November 28
The latest interop data Zhiqiang generated for Server-sent Events [All] indicates 102/124 passes and [2] isolates the 22 failures with less than two implementations including 9 failures which are due to Web IDL implementation bugs (thus, not counting the WebIDL failures the pass rate is 111/124 or ~90%). The non Web IDL failures are: 1. http://www.w3c-test.org/eventsource/dedicated-worker/eventsource-constructor-non-same-origin.htm 2. http://www.w3c-test.org/eventsource/shared-worker/eventsource-constructor-non-same-origin.htm 3. http://www.w3c-test.org/eventsource/format-field-retry-bogus.htm My take on these failures is: #1 and #2 test the UA's error handling of URLs that cannot be resolved (f.ex. unsupported URL scheme, URL doesn't exist). The failures appear to be relatively low priority implementation bugs (see [Bug119974]) that seem unlikely to occur in a tested deployment. #3 tests the UA's handling of invalid data value for the retry (constructor) parameter. This test actually now passes when I run it on FF beta 34.0 so it should be removed from [2]. Regardless, the failure appears to be a relatively low priority implementation bug that seems unlikely to occur in a tested deployment. As such, this is Call for Consensus to publish SSE as a Proposed Recommendation. If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this e-mail by November 28 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and encouraged, and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. The [ED] has changed since the [CR] was published (see [Diff]) so this proposal assumes that if/when there is a resource commitment to include changes on the TR track, that will be done separately. -Thanks, AB [All] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/eventsource/less-than-2.html [2] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/eventsource/less-than-2.html [Bug119974] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119974 [CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-eventsource-20121211/ [ED] http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ [Diff] http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fcvsweb%2F~checkout~%2Fhtml5%2Feventsource%2FOverview.html%3Frev%3D1.233%3Bcontent-type%3Dtext%252Fhtmldoc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fcvsweb%2F~checkout~%2Fhtml5%2Feventsource%2FOverview.html%3Frev%3D1.258%3Bcontent-type%3Dtext%252Fhtml
Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Server-Sent Events; deadline November 28
+1 On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: The latest interop data Zhiqiang generated for Server-sent Events [All] indicates 102/124 passes and [2] isolates the 22 failures with less than two implementations including 9 failures which are due to Web IDL implementation bugs (thus, not counting the WebIDL failures the pass rate is 111/124 or ~90%). The non Web IDL failures are: 1. http://www.w3c-test.org/eventsource/dedicated-worker/ eventsource-constructor-non-same-origin.htm 2. http://www.w3c-test.org/eventsource/shared-worker/ eventsource-constructor-non-same-origin.htm 3. http://www.w3c-test.org/eventsource/format-field-retry-bogus.htm My take on these failures is: #1 and #2 test the UA's error handling of URLs that cannot be resolved (f.ex. unsupported URL scheme, URL doesn't exist). The failures appear to be relatively low priority implementation bugs (see [Bug119974]) that seem unlikely to occur in a tested deployment. #3 tests the UA's handling of invalid data value for the retry (constructor) parameter. This test actually now passes when I run it on FF beta 34.0 so it should be removed from [2]. Regardless, the failure appears to be a relatively low priority implementation bug that seems unlikely to occur in a tested deployment. As such, this is Call for Consensus to publish SSE as a Proposed Recommendation. If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this e-mail by November 28 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and encouraged, and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. The [ED] has changed since the [CR] was published (see [Diff]) so this proposal assumes that if/when there is a resource commitment to include changes on the TR track, that will be done separately. -Thanks, AB [All] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/eventsource/less-than-2.html [2] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/eventsource/less-than-2.html [Bug119974] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119974 [CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-eventsource-20121211/ [ED] http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ [Diff] http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F% 2Fdev.w3.org%2Fcvsweb%2F~checkout~%2Fhtml5%2Feventsource%2FOverview.html% 3Frev%3D1.233%3Bcontent-type%3Dtext%252Fhtmldoc2=http%3A% 2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fcvsweb%2F~checkout~%2Fhtml5% 2Feventsource%2FOverview.html%3Frev%3D1.258%3Bcontent-type%3Dtext%252Fhtml
