From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:m...@apple.com]
Sent: 12 May 2015 03:34
On May 7, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me wrote:
From: Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Steve Faulkner
faulkner.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently ARIA does
On 9 May 2015 at 22:22, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com wrote:
However, I'm on the fence about whether this proposal is the way forward
for that problem. On the one hand, many developers (including me) have an
expectation when they first encounter ARIA that it will magically affect
On May 7, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me wrote:
From: Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.com
wrote:
Currently ARIA does not do this stuff AFAIK.
Correct. ARIA only exposes strings to AT. We could
I agree we badly need the primitives, but it seems to me like there is
potentially an easier and maybe even bigger win in making it more
straightforward for developers to reuse existing patterns (like the one you
described for button earlier) than in explaining the existing patterns
and allowing
On 7 May 2015 at 06:43, Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.com wrote:
On another thread recent thread, leonie and chaals [3] talked about adding
behaviours to ARIA.
this makes sense, but (unless I'm inventing nonsense because I'm mad,
which is definitely possible), doesn't this describe the
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently ARIA does not do this stuff AFAIK.
Correct. ARIA only exposes strings to AT. We could maybe make it do
more, once we understand what more means, which is basically figuring
out HTML as Custom Elements...
From: Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.com
wrote:
Currently ARIA does not do this stuff AFAIK.
Correct. ARIA only exposes strings to AT. We could maybe make it do more,
once we understand what more means, which is
On 7 May 2015 at 07:53, Bruce Lawson bru...@opera.com wrote:
this makes sense, but (unless I'm inventing nonsense because I'm mad,
which is definitely possible), doesn't this describe the current
behaviour in many UAs anyway?
Currently ARIA does not do this stuff AFAIK. There is some limited
On 07/05/2015 08:59, Domenic Denicola wrote:
...
These are my thoughts as well. The proposal seems nice as a
convenient way to get a given bundle of behaviors. But we *really*
need to stop considering these roles as atomic, and instead break
them down into what they really mean.
In other words,
On 07/05/2015 08:02, Steve Faulkner wrote:
On 7 May 2015 at 07:53, Bruce Lawson bru...@opera.com
mailto:bru...@opera.com wrote:
this makes sense, but (unless I'm inventing nonsense because I'm mad,
which is definitely possible), doesn't this describe the current
behaviour in many
Forwarding on as this relates to custom elements which use ARIA to provide
semantics
--
Regards
SteveF
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.com
Date: 7 May 2015 at 06:42
Subject: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together
To: HTMLWG WG public
11 matches
Mail list logo
