Re: Meeting for selection API at TPAC?

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile > wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:42:07 +0100, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > >> Thanks for the rely. >> >> Léonie & Chaals, could we allocate a time slot to discuss selection? > > Sure. Any preferences for minimising clashes? How long do you

Re: Meeting for selection API at TPAC?

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:42:07 +0100, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: Thanks for the rely. Léonie & Chaals, could we allocate a time slot to discuss selection? Sure. Any preferences for minimising clashes? How long do you think you need? cheers Chaals On Mar 15, 2016, at 8:33 PM, Yoshifumi Inoue w

Re: Meeting for selection API at TPAC?

Thanks for the rely. Léonie & Chaals, could we allocate a time slot to discuss selection? > On Mar 15, 2016, at 8:33 PM, Yoshifumi Inoue wrote: > > Sorry for late response. > > I would like to discuss following topics: > 1. Selection for Shadow DOM > 2. Multiple Range support > 3. Resolution o

Re: Meeting for selection API at TPAC?

Sorry for late response. I would like to discuss following topics: 1. Selection for Shadow DOM 2. Multiple Range support 3. Resolution of open issues towards FPWD - yosi 2016年3月15日(火) 9:21 Ryosuke Niwa : > Hi all, > > Is there any interest in discussing selection API at TPAC? > > There are 32 o

Meeting for selection API at TPAC?

Hi all, Is there any interest in discussing selection API at TPAC? There are 32 open issues on Github at the moment: https://github.com/w3c/selection-api/issues - R. Niwa