Re: [manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-15 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Marcos Caceres (mailto:mar...@marcosc.com)> wrote: > > I still think that leaving out name and icons from a manifest about > bookmarks is a big mistake. I just made my case here > > http://lis

Re: [manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-14 Thread Alex Russell
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Marcos Caceres > wrote: > > The editors of the [manifest] spec have now closed all substantive > issues for "v1". > > > > The spec defines the following: > > > > * A link relationship for manifests (so the

[manifest] name and icons, was Re: [manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-12 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > I still think that leaving out name and icons from a manifest about > bookmarks is a big mistake. I just made my case here > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2014Feb/0039.html I'll reply separately. > Basically

Re: [manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-12 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > The editors of the [manifest] spec have now closed all substantive issues for > "v1". > > The spec defines the following: > > * A link relationship for manifests (so they can be used with rel="manifest">). > > * A standard file name for