Re: [manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-14 Thread Alex Russell
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Marcos Caceres mar...@marcosc.com wrote: The editors of the [manifest] spec have now closed all substantive issues for v1. The spec defines the following: * A link relationship

Re: [manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-12 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Marcos Caceres mar...@marcosc.com wrote: The editors of the [manifest] spec have now closed all substantive issues for v1. The spec defines the following: * A link relationship for manifests (so they can be used with link rel=manifest). * A standard

[manifest] name and icons, was Re: [manifest] V1 ready for wider review

2014-02-12 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: I still think that leaving out name and icons from a manifest about bookmarks is a big mistake. I just made my case here http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2014Feb/0039.html I'll reply separately. Basically I