Hi All,
This CfC (original thread is [1]) is now moving forward and on March 17
there will be two publications:
1. /UI Events (Keyboard Extension)/; W3C Working Group Note; (draft is
http://jay.w3.org/~plehegar/uievents-ext.html).
2. /UI Events Specification (formerly DOM Level 3 Events)/;
On 11/21/14 8:43 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 09:44 -0500, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 11/19/14 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
Although there appears to be agreement that work on the
On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 10:22 -0500, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Travis, Gary, Philippe,
Since Anne's proposal hasn't been implemented, what exactly is the plan
for these two specs?
There is also a related proposal DOM L3 Events Input Events Work to the
Editing Task Force by Ben [Ben] and
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 09:44 -0500, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 11/19/14 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com
wrote:
Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec
should stop, the various replies
On 11/7/14 10:28 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
During WebApps' October 27 meeting, the participants agreed to stop
work on the UI Events spec and to publish it as a WG Note (see
[Mins]). As such, this is a formal Call for Consensus (CfC) to:
a) Stop work on this spec
b) Publish a gutted WG Note
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec
should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I consider
this CfC (as written) as failed.
Travis, Gary - would you please
On 11/19/14 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec
should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I consider
this CfC (as written) as
+1
On 19-Nov-2014 8:07 pm, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com
wrote:
Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec
should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com
wrote:
If anyone has comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by
November
14 at the latest.
My concern is that we previously agreed that
On 11/7/14 10:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone has comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by November
14 at the latest.
My concern is that we previously agreed that UI Events would be a much
more
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone has comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by November
14 at the latest.
My concern is that we previously agreed that UI Events would be a much
more suitable name for the contents of DOM Level 3
, November 7, 2014 7:36 AM
To: Arthur Barstow
Cc: public-webapps; www-...@w3.org
Subject: Re: CfC: publish WG Note of UI Events; deadline November 14
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone has comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply
12 matches
Mail list logo