Re: Shadow DOM spec for v1 is ready to be reviewed

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Hayato Ito wrote: > I think the spec should address these issues and define the well-defined > behavior clearly. The current spec looks too lazy because it only mention > the following: > >> Window object named properties [HTML] must access the

Re: Shadow DOM spec for v1 is ready to be reviewed

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 12:53 AM Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Hayato Ito wrote: > > - Some of the remaining issues are difficult to address in the Shadow DOM > > spec because it requires non-trivial monkey patches to DOM. I

Re: Shadow DOM spec for v1 is ready to be reviewed

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Hayato Ito wrote: > - Some of the remaining issues are difficult to address in the Shadow DOM > spec because it requires non-trivial monkey patches to DOM. I have a plan > to upstream the Shadow DOM spec into DOM in the near future. After that,

Re: Shadow DOM spec for v1 is ready to be reviewed

Thank you for the feedback! Let me take a look at the filed issues. I really appreciate it. It looks https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/308 is the only conceptual problem. I think I can send "Intent to Implement: Shadow DOM v1" in Blink soon. :) On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:43 AM Ryosuke

Re: Shadow DOM spec for v1 is ready to be reviewed

Thanks for the update! > On Aug 27, 2015, at 11:33 PM, Hayato Ito wrote: > > Let me post a quick update for the Shadow DOM spec: > https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/ >