Workers v2 (Was: Refactoring SharedWorkers out of Web Workers W3C spec)

2013-12-11 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Jonas Sicking wrote: However I'd really like to see us start a level 2 of the spec. The synchronous messaging channels is something else I'd like to see done there. There's seven features I'm aware of that people have asked for that aren't in Workers currently, or are

Re: Workers v2 (Was: Refactoring SharedWorkers out of Web Workers W3C spec)

2013-12-11 Thread pira...@gmail.com
- Canvas in Workers There's been various proposals, including one in the spec that hasn't met with implementor approval; I'm waiting for something to get traction amongst the competing proposals. - Being clearer about what features are visible in workers Blocked on:

Re: Workers v2

2013-12-11 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, pira...@gmail.com wrote: - Canvas in Workers There's been various proposals, including one in the spec that hasn't met with implementor approval; I'm waiting for something to get traction amongst the competing proposals. - Being clearer about what

Re: Workers v2

2013-12-11 Thread pira...@gmail.com
Thanks for the clarification :-) It shouldn't be dificult, specially for DataChannels: WebWorkers has already support for WebSockets and their API is the same (and the security context fairly similar...). I agree on let this discussion to the WebRTC group. Send from my Samsung Galaxy Note II El