I have no opinion whatsoever, except that the spec should specify it
one way or the other so I can close these bugs. :)
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Good question. I don't have a strong opinion. It makes sense to me to
allow anything. Don't know I there
I say we should allow the empty string. Apparently there were no
specific reason why we added such a check to our code.
/ Jonas
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Mark Pilgrim pilg...@google.com wrote:
I have no opinion whatsoever, except that the spec should specify it
one way or the other so I
OK, I'll close out our bugs on the subject and point to this conversation.
Thanks,
-Mark
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I say we should allow the empty string. Apparently there were no
specific reason why we added such a check to our code.
/ Jonas
On
1. Can an object store be named the empty string?
2. Can an index be named the empty string?
Other things, like databases, are allowed to have a name that is the
empty string. Mozilla has tests that expect both of the above cases to
fail, but as I'm porting those tests to WebKit, it's not clear
Good question. I don't have a strong opinion. It makes sense to me to
allow anything. Don't know I there was any reason we added explicit
checks.
/ Jonas
On Monday, April 25, 2011, Mark Pilgrim pilg...@google.com wrote:
1. Can an object store be named the empty string?
2. Can an index be
