Re: [Shadow DOM] Separating Transclusion Mechanisms for Inheritance and Data Binding

2014-04-21 Thread Hayato Ito
Thank you for the proposal. Sounds like the first part of the proposal is based on the feature which was reverted in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24288. In the current spec, the child elements in shadow are simply *ignored*. Therefore, I'm afraid that a shadow tree for

Re: [Shadow DOM] Separating Transclusion Mechanisms for Inheritance and Data Binding

2014-04-21 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
No, our proposal doesn't invoke multiple generations of shadow DOM. As such, it works just fine without shadow element. - R. Niwa On Apr 20, 2014, at 11:18 PM, Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org wrote: Thank you for the proposal. Sounds like the first part of the proposal is based on the

Re: [Shadow DOM] Separating Transclusion Mechanisms for Inheritance and Data Binding

2014-04-21 Thread William Chen
On 4/17/14, 2:42 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: *Review: Template Inheritance in the Current Specification* In the current specification, a super class doesn't define any hooks for subclasses. Instead, it defines insertion points into which nodes from the original DOM (light DOM) is inserted, and

Re: [Shadow DOM] Separating Transclusion Mechanisms for Inheritance and Data Binding

2014-04-21 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Apr 21, 2014, at 4:36 PM, William Chen wc...@mozilla.com wrote: On 4/17/14, 2:42 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: Review: Template Inheritance in the Current Specification In the current specification, a super class doesn't define any hooks for subclasses. Instead, it defines insertion points