: [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Travis Leithead wrote:
>
> Is this the right list to comment about the web workers specification?
This list or the WHATWG list, yes.
> I filed a bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11827 and
Thanks. I'v
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 01:09:53 +0100, Travis Leithead
wrote:
Is this the right list to comment about the web workers specification?
I filed a bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11827 and
am also interested in participating (or forming?) a regular meeting time
to discuss this
Hi Drew,
> @2011-01-20 16:44 -0800:
> I'm also curious about this - I wrote a set of tests for SharedWorkers for
> WebKit that cover some of the subtler points around worker lifetime that I'm
> suspecting other implementations would find useful, and I'm guessing that
> there are tests from other i
e:
> Also, have any tests been submitted for this spec yet?
>
>
>
> *From:* Travis Leithead
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:10 PM
> *To:* public-webapps
> *Cc:* Adrian Bateman
> *Subject:* [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question
>
>
>
> Is this th
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Travis Leithead wrote:
>
> Is this the right list to comment about the web workers specification?
This list or the WHATWG list, yes.
> I filed a bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11827 and
Thanks. I've commented on the bug.
> am also interested in partic
Also, have any tests been submitted for this spec yet?
From: Travis Leithead
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:10 PM
To: public-webapps
Cc: Adrian Bateman
Subject: [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question
Is this the right list to comment about the web workers specification?
I filed a bug
Is this the right list to comment about the web workers specification?
I filed a bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11827 and am also
interested in participating (or forming?) a regular meeting time to discuss
this spec, it's status, and path to REC.
It seems to be at LCWD, but
