On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:36:46 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:01:10 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
│ This is the Document pointer.
If 'pointer' or 'Document pointer' is a term (which the styling
seems to indi
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:35:10 +0200, Erik Dahlström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If a term is used in many places (like 'Document pointer') it makes
sense IMHO to keep those definitions in one central place, such as
section 2.2. Especially given the fact that the definition of this
particular
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:36:46 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:01:10 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
│ This is the Document pointer.
If 'pointer' or 'Document pointer' is a term (which the styling
seems to ind
On 13/06/2008, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:01:10 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > │ This is the Document pointer.
> > > > > If 'pointer' or 'Document pointer' is a term (which the styling
> seems to indi
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:01:10 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
│ This is the Document pointer.
If 'pointer' or 'Document pointer' is a term (which the styling
seems to indicate) then please add it to section 2.2.
The specification defines various term
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:24:46 +0200, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Anne van Kesteren:
Since not everything is fully detailed yet in HTML5 this would be an
ongoing process that I rather not do. Also, it should be quite obvious
that XMLHttpRequest does not depend on database stora
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:01:10 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
│ This is the Document pointer.
If 'pointer' or 'Document pointer' is a term (which the styling seems
to indicate) then please add it to section 2.2.
The specification defines various terms throughout the specifica
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Jonas Sicking:
> > > I wonder if this can be fixed in the HTML5 spec to say that when
> > > serializing a whole document, no xmlns="" attribute needs to be
> > > inserted.
>
> That sounds like a good solution to me.
>
> Ian Hickson:
> > We still s
Jonas Sicking:
> > I wonder if this can be fixed in the HTML5 spec to say that when
> > serializing a whole document, no xmlns="" attribute needs to be
> > inserted.
That sounds like a good solution to me.
Ian Hickson:
> We still somewhat want them in that case too, in case the string is then
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> I wonder if this can be fixed in the HTML5 spec to say that when
> serializing a whole document, no xmlns="" attribute needs to be
> inserted.
We still somewhat want them in that case too, in case the string is then
used to assign into an elemnet
In the send() algorithm:
│ ↪ data is a Document
│
│ Let data be data.innerHTML as defined by section 2.5 of HTML 5.
│ Encode it using data.inputEncoding or UTF-8 if
│ data.inputEncoding is null. Re-raise any exceptions the
│ data.innerHTML getter algorithm raises. [HTML5]
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Cameron McCormack wrote:
>
> But in HTML 5 browsing contexts are defined in terms of views, not the
> Window object. Origin seems to be defined in terms of the browsing
> context and “the active document of the Window object of the browsing
> context from which the XMLHttpReq
Hi Anne.
Cameron McCormack:
>> Could you mention here exactly what parts of HTML 5 are depended upon?
>> This would help implementations that wish to implement only the
>> XMLHttpRequest interface, without for example support for clientside
>> databases and various other things in the Window
│ This is the Document pointer.
If 'pointer' or 'Document pointer' is a term (which the styling seems
to indicate) then please add it to section 2.2.
The specification defines various terms throughout the specification.
Only terms that didn't really fit anywhere else are in section 2.2.
Dear SVG WG,
I noticed you e-mailed your comments to our new list. Thanks! (Despite
this being contrary to the advice in the XMLHttpRequest Last Call draft I
will still duly process them...)
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:00:51 +0200, Erik Dahlström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
│ A conforming use
15 matches
Mail list logo