Re: [XHR] xhr.responseXML.cookie ?
On 9/20/13 7:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: It's defined here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/dom.html#dom-document-cookie Though note that this part of the spec is in flux. In particular, the whole HTMLDocument vs Document vs XMLDocument mess is still unclear, and the spec doesn't match implementations at all. I don't think tying XHR to that unstable stuff is a good idea. Though of course we do need to end up speccing _what_ sort of document is returned here, which may force a dependency. -Boris
Re: [XHR] xhr.responseXML.cookie ?
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:53:23 +0200, Hallvord Steen wrote: Hi, per this test: http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/XMLHttpRequest/responsexml-document-properties.htm some implementations define responseXML.cookie and some don't. This probably isn't really XML-related, but I guess it should be raised and possibly defined somewhere (is it already?)? It's defined here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/dom.html#dom-document-cookie Since that document has no browsing context, getting returns empty string and setting does nothing, per spec. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Re: [XHR] xhr.responseXML.cookie ?
> isn't really XML-related Clarification: I meant XHR-related. HR
[XHR] xhr.responseXML.cookie ?
Hi, per this test: http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/XMLHttpRequest/responsexml-document-properties.htm some implementations define responseXML.cookie and some don't. This probably isn't really XML-related, but I guess it should be raised and possibly defined somewhere (is it already?)? -Hallvord
