for
that matter.
Sergey Ilinsky/
--- On Thu, 12/2/09, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> From: Jonas Sicking
> Subject: Re: [XHR2] Progress events during synchronous requests
> To: "Anne van Kesteren"
> Cc: "Webapps WG"
> Date: Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 4:52 A
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:44:17 +0100, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason why the spec says to not send progress events
>> (upload and download) during synchronous requests, while still saying
>> that readystatechange events shou
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:44:17 +0100, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Is there a reason why the spec says to not send progress events
(upload and download) during synchronous requests, while still saying
that readystatechange events should be fired?
I guess it can be argued that progress events (especially
Hi All,
Is there a reason why the spec says to not send progress events
(upload and download) during synchronous requests, while still saying
that readystatechange events should be fired?
I guess it can be argued that progress events (especially the load
event) is less useful for synchronous loa
