On Dec 13, 2013 3:40 AM, "Maciej Stachowiak" wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, Google folks, for considering a name to document.register. Though
a small change, I think it will be a nice improvement to code clarity.
>
> Since we're bikeshedding, let me add a few more notes in favor of
defineElement for conside
I found registerElement a good candidate and parallel to
registerProtocolHandler, but after this comments I also think
declareElement is a better alternative. +1 to it.
Send from my Samsung Galaxy Note II
El 13/12/2013 10:18, "Dominic Cooney" escribió:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Kenneth
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <
kenneth.christian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also really like defineElement. I am not sure that it is easy to
> understand what it actually means to "register an element", where as
> defining an element is pretty clear.
>
> Kenneth
>
> On
I also really like defineElement. I am not sure that it is easy to
understand what it actually means to "register an element", where as
defining an element is pretty clear.
Kenneth
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Thanks, Google folks, for considering a name to docum
Thanks, Google folks, for considering a name to document.register. Though a
small change, I think it will be a nice improvement to code clarity.
Since we're bikeshedding, let me add a few more notes in favor of defineElement
for consideration:
1) In programming languages, you would normally sa
Also,
http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/webcomponents/customelements/
and
http://www.polymer-project.org/platform/custom-elements.html
already talk about custom elements as a way of "defining (and use) new (types
of DOM) elements".
I mean… even our current working draft says
"This specificat
I like defineElement a lot too. I think it gets to the heart of this method's
potential - the ability to define your own elements.
- Maciej
> On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Dominic Cooney wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:17 AM, pira...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I have seen registerProtocolHandl
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2013 11:48 PM, "Ryosuke Niwa" wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Dominic Cooney wrote:
> >
> ...
> >>> El 11/12/2013 21:10, "Edward O'Connor" escribió:
> >>>
> Hi,
>
> The name "register" is very g
On Dec 11, 2013 11:48 PM, "Ryosuke Niwa" wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Dominic Cooney wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:17 AM, pira...@gmail.com
wrote:
>>>
>>> I have seen registerProtocolHandler() and it's being discused
registerServiceWorker(). I believe registerElementDefiniti
On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Dominic Cooney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:17 AM, pira...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have seen registerProtocolHandler() and it's being discused
> registerServiceWorker(). I believe registerElementDefinition() or
> registerCustomElement() could help to keep going
I also agree with Ted.
I prefer 'registerElement' because I'm used to the concept of registration
wrt custom elements, but I'm not ginding any axe.
Scott
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Dominic Cooney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:17 AM, pira...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I have seen registe
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:17 AM, pira...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have seen registerProtocolHandler() and it's being discused
> registerServiceWorker(). I believe registerElementDefinition() or
> registerCustomElement() could help to keep going on this path.
>
> Send from my Samsung Galaxy Note II
> E
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:17 PM, pira...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have seen registerProtocolHandler() and it's being discused
> registerServiceWorker(). I believe registerElementDefinition() or
> registerCustomElement() could help to keep going on this path.
>
>
> Since a custom element is the only ki
I have seen registerProtocolHandler() and it's being discused
registerServiceWorker(). I believe registerElementDefinition() or
registerCustomElement() could help to keep going on this path.
Send from my Samsung Galaxy Note II
El 11/12/2013 21:10, "Edward O'Connor" escribió:
> Hi,
>
> The name "
Hi,
The name "register" is very generic and could mean practically anything.
We need to adopt a name for document.register() that makes its purpose
clear to authors looking to use custom elements or those reading someone
else's code that makes use of custom elements.
Here are some ideas:
documen
15 matches
Mail list logo