Re: [file-writer] WebIDL / References

2012-02-28 Thread Eric U
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Ms2ger wrote: > Hi all, > > There are a number of bugs in the WebIDL blocks in > . > > * The 'in' token has been removed; "void append (in Blob data);" should >  be "void append (Blob data);". Fixed. > * Ev

Re: [file-writer] WebIDL / References

2012-02-27 Thread Eric U
Thanks! I'll take care of those. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Ms2ger wrote: > Hi all, > > There are a number of bugs in the WebIDL blocks in > . > > * The 'in' token has been removed; "void append (in Blob data);" should >  be "void ap

[file-writer] WebIDL / References

2012-02-25 Thread Ms2ger
Hi all, There are a number of bugs in the WebIDL blocks in . * The 'in' token has been removed; "void append (in Blob data);" should be "void append (Blob data);". * Event handlers should be "[TreatNonCallableAsNull] Function? onfoo",