On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Yup. Though I think WebIDL will take care of the handling for when the
> author specifies a negative value. I.e. WebIDL will specify what
> exception to throw, so we don't need to. Similar to how WebIDL
> specifies what exception to throw if
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> Since advance is intended to always move the cursor forward, it seems we want
> to only support positive parameter values. Therefore, I would suggest we
> change its signature to:
>
> void advance (in unsigned int count);
>
> If a develop
Since advance is intended to always move the cursor forward, it seems we want
to only support positive parameter values. Therefore, I would suggest we
change its signature to:
void advance (in unsigned int count);
If a developer specifies a negative number for it, we could throw an
IDBDatabas
