RE: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit

2011-07-08 Thread Eliot Graff 
done

 -Original Message-
 From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-
 requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
 Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 6:13 PM
 To: Israel Hilerio
 Cc: ben turner; public-webapps@w3.org
 Subject: Re: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals
 commit
 
 On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
 wrote:
 On Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:52 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
 
 We noticed that section 4.3 Steps for committing a transaction talks
 about setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler
 to commit.
 Did we intend for the handler to be named oncommit or should the
 event type be complete.
 The current wording implies that the reason the transaction completed
 was because it was committed.
 The different terms made the section a little inconsistent.
 Do we want to change any names or keep it as is?
 
 Israel
 
  On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:04 PM, Ben Turner wrote:
 I think complete should be the correct type string.
 
  -Ben Turner
 
 
  If everyone else agrees with Ben and me, I can work with Eliot to make the
 change to the spec.
 
 Sounds great.
 
 / Jonas

RE: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit

2011-06-27 Thread Israel Hilerio 
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:52 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:

We noticed that section 4.3 Steps for committing a transaction talks about 
setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler to 
commit.   
Did we intend for the handler to be named oncommit or should the event type 
be complete.  
The current wording implies that the reason the transaction completed was 
because it was committed.  
The different terms made the section a little inconsistent.
Do we want to change any names or keep it as is?

Israel

On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:04 PM, Ben Turner wrote:
I think complete should be the correct type string.
 
 -Ben Turner
 

If everyone else agrees with Ben and me, I can work with Eliot to make the 
change to the spec.

Israel

[indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit

2011-06-23 Thread Israel Hilerio 
We noticed that section 4.3 Steps for committing a transaction talks about 
setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler to 
commit.   Did we intend for the handler to be named oncommit or should the 
event type be complete.  The current wording implies that the reason the 
transaction completed was because it was committed.  The different terms made 
the section a little inconsistent.

Do we want to change any names or keep it as is?

Israel

Re: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit

2011-06-23 Thread ben turner 
I think complete should be the correct type string.

-Ben Turner