Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (4)

2009-12-15 Thread Robin Berjon 
On Dec 9, 2009, at 19:15 , Larry Masinter wrote:
 4) ** EDITORIAL RE OTHER SCHEME  **
 
 In fact, it is possible that both this scheme and another defined to 
 access Zip archive content would be used jointly, with little or no overlap 
 in functionality.
 
 Without any other context, this is incomprehensible.
 
 Suggestion: remove sentence.
 
 Fair enough. The entire section has been removed.
 
 I looked for a version of the document in which the entire
 section has been removed. It's still there in 
 http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-uri/, and the Latest Editor's 
 Draft link supplied is 404 Not Found.

Sorry about that, I'm not sure how this went through PubRules! The ED is at:

  http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-uri/

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/

Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (4)

2009-11-19 Thread Robin Berjon 
Dear Larry,

thank you for your comments.

On Oct 10, 2009, at 19:44 , Larry Masinter wrote:
 4) ** EDITORIAL RE OTHER SCHEME  **
 
 In fact, it is possible that both this scheme and another defined to access 
 Zip archive content would be used jointly, with little or no overlap in 
 functionality.
 
 Without any other context, this is incomprehensible.
 
 Suggestion: remove sentence.

Fair enough. The entire section has been removed.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/