On 2012-08-06 13:25, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
On 2012-08-06 13:08, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
(12/07/31 20:06), Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 7/19/12 11:15 PM, ext Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/thread#msg518
I think this is a very minor
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu kangh...@oupeng.com wrote:
(12/08/06 19:25), Lachlan Hunt wrote:
On 2012-08-06 13:08, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
I'd rather find a way to address the issue. I've just been a bit busy
with other tasks for the last 2 weeks to look into this.
(12/07/31 20:06), Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 7/19/12 11:15 PM, ext Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
Sorry for my late comment.
While I think it's fine to publish LCWD Selectors API as it is, it would
be nice if it can address my comment in [1]. By address, I mean either
define the desired behavior
On 2012-08-06 13:08, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
(12/07/31 20:06), Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 7/19/12 11:15 PM, ext Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/thread#msg518
I completely missed that comment of yours when you originally sent it,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote:
On 2012-08-06 13:08, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
I think this is a very minor issue, and it has a simple workaround -
mark it as undefined. However, if Lachlan doesn't feel like paying extra
fee for versionning (what
From: Lachlan Hunt [mailto:lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au]
I'd like feedback from implementers about how best to address the issue.
The options I can think of:
1. Disallow all comments within the selector for this API. Throw SyntaxError
when they are used.
2. Allow comments, but define that
On 7/19/12 11:15 PM, ext Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
Sorry for my late comment.
While I think it's fine to publish LCWD Selectors API as it is, it would
be nice if it can address my comment in [1]. By address, I mean either
define the desired behavior or explicitly mark it as undefined (which I
Sorry for my late comment.
While I think it's fine to publish LCWD Selectors API as it is, it would
be nice if it can address my comment in [1]. By address, I mean either
define the desired behavior or explicitly mark it as undefined (which I
think is better than not saying anything because an
On 2012-06-28 18:03, Stewart Brodie wrote:
Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
This is a Request for Comments for the June 28 Last Call Working Draft
of Selectors API Level 1:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-selectors-api-20120628/
The comment deadline is July 19 and all comments should
Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
This is a Request for Comments for the June 28 Last Call Working Draft
of Selectors API Level 1:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-selectors-api-20120628/
The comment deadline is July 19 and all comments should be sent to the
public-webapps@w3.org
10 matches
Mail list logo
