Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-31 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Phillips, Addison wrote: Assuming for a moment that CSS3 does not resolve the problem with Unicode normalization in selectors, users of selectors-api will be potentially surprised by the results in certain circumstances involving denormalized selectors. I have discussed this with my co-edito

RE: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-30 Thread Phillips, Addison
. It is an architecture. > -Original Message- > From: Lachlan Hunt [mailto:lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au] > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:16 PM > To: Phillips, Addison > Cc: public-webapps@w3.org; public-i18n-c...@w3.org > Subject: Re: [selectors-api] Selecto

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Phillips, Addison wrote: However, I18N feels that our two WGs can construct a useful, informative, small, and relatively-painless bit of text to allow you to proceed. Please let us know if you think this an appropriate way to address this issue or if we can assist in any way to help you guys

RE: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-30 Thread Phillips, Addison
public-i18n-core-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-core- > requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Phillips, Addison > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:40 AM > To: Lachlan Hunt > Cc: public-webapps@w3.org; public-i18n-c...@w3.org > Subject: RE: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review... >

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-28 Thread fantasai
Phillips, Addison wrote: Dear Webapps WG, I am writing on behalf of the I18N Core WG who discussed the Selectors API WD in our call of 3 December [1]. We reviewed the Selectors API working draft. In reviewing this draft, we did not find any internationalization issues in the text of the docume

RE: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-27 Thread Phillips, Addison
: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:39 AM > To: Phillips, Addison > Cc: public-webapps@w3.org; public-i18n-c...@w3.org > Subject: Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review... > > Phillips, Addison wrote: > > I am writing on behalf of the I18N Core WG who discussed the > >

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Phillips, Addison wrote: I am writing on behalf of the I18N Core WG who discussed the Selectors API WD in our call of 3 December [1]. We reviewed the Selectors API working draft. In reviewing this draft, we did not find any internationalization issues in the text of the document. However, we

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:46:42 +0100, Phillips, Addison wrote: Please note that members of the WG also found two minor editorial issues [3] [[[ 3. Interoperability Considerations: "... such implementations could return different results from those that do support

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2008-12-15 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:46:42 +0100, Phillips, Addison wrote: Dear Webapps WG, I am writing on behalf of the I18N Core WG who discussed the Selectors API WD in our call of 3 December [1]. ... Please note that members of the WG also found two minor editorial issues [3] Actually I thin

[selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2008-12-15 Thread Phillips, Addison
Dear Webapps WG, I am writing on behalf of the I18N Core WG who discussed the Selectors API WD in our call of 3 December [1]. We reviewed the Selectors API working draft. In reviewing this draft, we did not find any internationalization issues in the text of the document. However, we would lik