Despite little love from Scott for the mischievous walrus -- }); --
proliferation across the Web, are there any other cries of horror that
I should be listening to? I am hankering to write this as a spec
draft. Yell now to stop me.
:DG
As long as there is a way to access the element from the script, I'm
good.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.comwrote:
Despite little love from Scott for the mischievous walrus -- }); --
proliferation across the Web, are there any other cries of horror that
I
Walking the ancestors from document.currentScript is a start. Is that
sufficient or should we add a document.currentElement?
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Scott Miles sjmi...@google.com wrote:
As long as there is a way to access the element from the script, I'm
good.
On Wed, May 15,
Since 'currentScript' is already spec'd (right?) that seems better.
I suppose my concern was about implementation, which is an orthogonal
problem to the specification.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org wrote:
Walking the ancestors from document.currentScript
