Re: [webidl] [Implements] extended attribute

2009-02-10 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:43:56 +0100, Ian Hickson wrote: > > (Incidentally, since XMLHttpRequestEventTarget inherits from EventTarget, > > XMLHttpRequestUpload should implement the former only.) > > I was thinking of maybe breaking that though in cas

Re: [webidl] [Implements] extended attribute

2009-02-10 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:43:56 +0100, Ian Hickson wrote: (Incidentally, since XMLHttpRequestEventTarget inherits from EventTarget, XMLHttpRequestUpload should implement the former only.) I was thinking of maybe breaking that though in case of XMLHttpRequestEventTarget I suppose it makes actua

Re: [webidl] [Implements] extended attribute

2009-02-09 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > To complement [ImplementedOn] I think we need [Implements]. For > instance, objects implementing the XMLHttpRequest interface must > implement the EventTarget interface can be neatly described in the IDL: > > [Constructor, >Implements=Even

[webidl] [Implements] extended attribute

2009-02-09 Thread Anne van Kesteren
To complement [ImplementedOn] I think we need [Implements]. For instance, objects implementing the XMLHttpRequest interface must implement the EventTarget interface can be neatly described in the IDL: [Constructor, Implements=EventTarget] interface XMLHttpRequest ... It would be nic