Re: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?

2011-04-05 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: What needs to be done before the WebSocket API is LC ready? I'm currently waiting for a number of editorial changes to the protocol specification to provide hooks for the API specification so that I can update the API apecification to work with the

Re: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?

2011-04-05 Thread Adam Barth
There's also potentially protocol changes that will cause use to need to fix things at the API layer. For example, if the IETF introduces redirects into the protocol, we'll likely need to account for them at the API layer:

Re: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?

2011-04-05 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Adam Barth wrote: There's also potentially protocol changes that will cause use to need to fix things at the API layer. For example, if the IETF introduces redirects into the protocol, we'll likely need to account for them at the API layer:

RE: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?

2011-04-05 Thread Adrian Bateman
On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:27 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi All, What needs to be done before the WebSocket API is LC ready? Bugzilla has three open bugs for this spec: 1. API for send/receive of binary data? Current IETF protocol drafts have binary type. Consider typed arrays