cos Caceres
> Sent: 23 April 2009 08:53
> To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
> Cc: Frederick Hirsch; Web Applications Working Group WG; Babbage,
> Steve, VF-Group
> Subject: Re: [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations on
> elliptic curve algorithms to consider
>
>
tions Working Group WG; Babbage,
Steve, VF-Group
Subject: Re: [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations
on elliptic curve algorithms to consider
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
wrote:
Hi Frederick, All,
Vodafone supports the move to support ECDSA in XML Sign
53
To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Cc: Frederick Hirsch; Web Applications Working Group WG; Babbage, Steve,
VF-Group
Subject: Re: [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations on elliptic
curve algorithms to consider
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
wrote:
> Hi F
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
wrote:
> Hi Frederick, All,
>
> Vodafone supports the move to support ECDSA in XML Signature 1.1 [2] and
> welcomes the new clarifying text. Vodafone will not object to
> ECDSAwithSHA256 being specified as mandatory [2] however we would li
review: Additional considerations on
elliptic curve algorithms to consider
The XML Security WG would like to refine the question about the
suitability of elliptic curve as a mandatory to implement algorithm
for XML Signature 1.1 by highlighting that the scope of elliptic
curve is greatly
The XML Security WG would like to refine the question about the
suitability of elliptic curve as a mandatory to implement algorithm
for XML Signature 1.1 by highlighting that the scope of elliptic
curve is greatly limited in what is proposed to be mandatory in XML
Signature 1.1.
As T
