On Monday, May 2, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Marcos, All - re processing comments submitted against the 22-Mar-2011
PC LCWD, FYI, below are the comments I noted.
Are there any other comments, bugs, etc. that need to be considered?
Not from me. BTW, Aplix is also now claiming to be passing 100% of the test
suite, which is fantastic. Opera is only 5 tests out from reaching 100% (they
actually pass 100% if the widgets are treated as Opera Extensions). There is a
small bug in Opera's Desktop implementation that rejects widget without a name.
I'm hopeful this will be fixed RSN.
I recorded the following comments since that LCWD was published:
= Charles McCathieNevile; 8-Apr-2011; localizingauthor
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0121.html
Addressed:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0457.html
= Addison Phillips; 30-Mar-2011; clarification on 9.1.3
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/1076.html
Addressed:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0459.html
= Jonathan Rees; 23-Mar-2011; bug in example in step 6 of media type
algorithm in WD-widgets-20110322 ?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/1042.html
Addressed:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0462.html
Marcos - are there any other LCWD comments?
I think that is it! :)