RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review

2009-07-17 Thread Marcin Hanclik
-device-a...@w3.org Subject: RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review Le lundi 13 juillet 2009 à 13:38 +0200, Marcin Hanclik a écrit : I cannot publish the source code now, also due to the immaturity of the tool. I personally wouldn't mind that immaturity and would be happy to contribute

Re: [widgets] conformance requirements review

2009-07-17 Thread Robin Berjon
On Jul 17, 2009, at 15:04 , Marcin Hanclik wrote: Is it possible that BONDI specs, together with widl format specification are taken as basis in DAP? Who, when and how takes this decision? That would be a decision for the DAP WG to take, once there are enough participants signed up (it

RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review

2009-07-13 Thread Marcin Hanclik
.org Subject: RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review Le dimanche 05 juillet 2009 à 18:50 +0200, Marcin Hanclik a écrit : Just FYI I created a tool to check the BONDI specs under: http://bondi01.obe.access-company.com/ It automatically checks each new release of the BONDI specs directly

RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review

2009-07-07 Thread Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Le dimanche 05 juillet 2009 à 18:50 +0200, Marcin Hanclik a écrit : Just FYI I created a tool to check the BONDI specs under: http://bondi01.obe.access-company.com/ It automatically checks each new release of the BONDI specs directly from the SVN repository. Very nice! Would it be possible

Re: [widgets] conformance requirements review

2009-07-07 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Dom, Responses inline... As before, for the sake of the Disposition of Comments, please let us know if you are satisfied with the responses below. On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieuxd...@w3.org wrote: Hi, I wrote a simple XSLT to extract the conformance

Re: [widgets] conformance requirements review

2009-07-07 Thread Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Le mardi 07 juillet 2009 à 20:11 +0200, Marcos Caceres a écrit : Responses inline... As before, for the sake of the Disposition of Comments, please let us know if you are satisfied with the responses below. I'm satisfied, thanks. Dom

RE: [widgets] conformance requirements review

2009-07-05 Thread Marcin Hanclik
- From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dominique Hazael-Massieux Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 10:04 AM To: public-webapps@w3.org Subject: [widgets] conformance requirements review Hi, I wrote a simple XSLT to extract the conformance requirements

[widgets] conformance requirements review

2009-06-17 Thread Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Hi, I wrote a simple XSLT to extract the conformance requirements from the Widgets spec [1], with the following output: http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xslfile=http%3A%2F% 2Fdev.w3.org%2F2006%2Fwaf%2Fwidgets%2Ftests% 2FextractTestAssertions.xslxmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.w3.org%2Fcgi-bin%