Re: [widgets] i18n span element VS unicode RLM/LRM

2008-10-08 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Felix (and i18n Core), During our last WAF teleconf, WebApps decided to adopt your suggestions (below). I've been attempting to integrate your suggestions into the Widget Packaging spec [1]. Below I summarize what draft text I have added thus far. I would really appreciate any feedback if you

Re: [widgets] i18n span element VS unicode RLM/LRM

2008-10-08 Thread Felix Sasaki
Hi Marcos, thank you very much for your response. I am happy with your resolution. One comment below Marcos Caceres さんは書きました: Hi Felix (and i18n Core), During our last WAF teleconf, WebApps decided to adopt your suggestions (below). I've been attempting to integrate your suggestions into

Re: [widgets] i18n span element VS unicode RLM/LRM

2008-10-08 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Felix, I've passed your schema related comments to our schema maintainer (David Håsäther, CC'd). Unless David has any comments, objections or modifications, I would expect to see your recommendations in the schema in the next publication. Thanks again! On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Felix

[widgets] i18n span element VS unicode RLM/LRM

2008-09-10 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi, i18n-WG. In recent feedback we received from Addison Phillips regarding the Widgets 1.0: Packaging specification, he suggested that WebApps should add a span-like element to our Widget Configuration Document format (so to allow bidi text to be declared). At our last F2F, WebApps discussed

Re: [widgets] i18n span element VS unicode RLM/LRM

2008-09-10 Thread Felix Sasaki
Hello Marcos, many people from the i18n core WG are away this week, so there might be more replies later. This is a personal reply. Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi, i18n-WG. In recent feedback we received from Addison Phillips regarding the Widgets 1.0: Packaging specification, he suggested that