On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Scott Wilson
scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
In Wookie we just create the widget object in the global scope, and then add
it as an attribute to the window object. Author scripts can access it either
by window.widget or just plain widget.
I wonder though -
Le 08/02/2010 13:29, Robin Berjon a écrit :
On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolatocyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote:
So I'm wondering how should the widget object be implemented in a UA
that does not support the window object ?
Yeah,
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote:
Le 08/02/2010 13:29, Robin Berjon a écrit :
On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolatocyril.concol...@enst.fr
wrote:
So I'm wondering how should the widget
On Feb 9, 2010, at 09:54 , Cyril Concolato wrote:
My mistake. I had not realized that. But again, the question is why put the
widget object on the window object, apart from it being a black hole. Why not
put it in the global object. What's wrong with that? It would easier to
specify. What's
On 9 Feb 2010, at 09:22, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr
wrote:
Le 08/02/2010 13:29, Robin Berjon a écrit :
On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril
On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr
wrote:
So I'm wondering how should the widget object be implemented in a UA
that does not support the window object ?
Yeah, that's a tough one... the spec says:
For a
Robin Berjon wrote:
On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolatocyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote:
So I'm wondering how should the widget object be implemented in a UA
that does not support the window object ?
Yeah, that's a tough one... the
On Feb 8, 2010, at 13:51 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
As much as I dislike it, I'm also not that inclined to define what to do for
non-Window-based implementations (beyond what we currently have in the
spec; which, I admit, is not much).
I don't think that we could even if we wanted to.
Robin Berjon wrote:
On Feb 8, 2010, at 13:51 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
As much as I dislike it, I'm also not that inclined to define what to do for
non-Window-based implementations (beyond what we currently have in the spec;
which, I admit, is not much).
I don't think that we could even if
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote:
Hi all,
After PC, I'm looking now at the Widget Interface spec, in particular to
check the test suite and produce the implementation report. I have a problem
with the spec. In GPAC, we implement only SVG not HTML5,
Le 05/02/2010 16:18, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolatocyril.concol...@enst.fr wrote:
Hi all,
After PC, I'm looking now at the Widget Interface spec, in particular to
check the test suite and produce the implementation report. I have a problem
with the
Hi all,
After PC, I'm looking now at the Widget Interface spec, in particular to check
the test suite and produce the implementation report. I have a problem with the
spec. In GPAC, we implement only SVG not HTML5, with the Window object. So I'm
wondering how should the widget object be
12 matches
Mail list logo
