On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
We should not have readAsArryBufferView since there's a ton of
different types of ArrayBufferViews. Instead we should just return an
ArrayBuffer and let
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:13:42 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.com wrote:
The constructor will switch to use ArrayBufferView in lieu of
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
We should not have readAsArryBufferView since there's a ton of
different types of ArrayBufferViews. Instead we should just return an
ArrayBuffer and let people construct ArrayBufferViews or DataViews
into that as they see
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.comwrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:13:42 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.com wrote:
The constructor will switch to use ArrayBufferView in lieu of
ArrayBuffer, but the read method exposed on FileReader and
On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:13:42 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.com wrote:
The constructor will switch to use ArrayBufferView in lieu of ArrayBuffer,
but the read method exposed on FileReader and FileReaderSync will read files
On Apr 24, 2012, at 7:00 PM, David Herman wrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:53 PM, David Herman wrote:
On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
I intend to add ArrayBufferView as a parameter to the Blob constructor .
Would it be possible also to allow passing an ArrayBuffer with
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:13:42 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.com wrote:
The constructor will switch to use ArrayBufferView in lieu of
ArrayBuffer, but the read method exposed on FileReader and
FileReaderSync will read files into memory as ArrayBuffers.
Since the constructor is
On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
I intend to add ArrayBufferView as a parameter to the Blob constructor .
Would it be possible also to allow passing an ArrayBuffer with an offset and
length as an additional alternative? This would eliminate the need to create a
view when
On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:53 PM, David Herman wrote:
On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
I intend to add ArrayBufferView as a parameter to the Blob constructor .
Would it be possible also to allow passing an ArrayBuffer with an offset and
length as an additional alternative?
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:11:38 +0200, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:48:12 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu
wrote:
Because it's still in the current editor's draft and it's still in the
This should make it easier to append limited views; appending the
.buffer is a footgun because it appends the whole buffer.
-Boris
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:26:24 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
This should make it easier to append limited views; appending the
.buffer is a footgun because it appends the whole buffer.
Why are we still discussing BlobBuilder? I thought we discussed long ago
it should be removed
On 4/12/12 3:44 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:26:24 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
This should make it easier to append limited views; appending the
.buffer is a footgun because it appends the whole buffer.
Why are we still discussing BlobBuilder?
Because
On 4/12/12 3:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Blob with constructor is in http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/
Right. I'd ended up at the File Writer spec.
I thought the idea was to not have BlobBuilder at all.
Dunno. Is there content depending on it?
-Boris
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:58:00 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 4/12/12 3:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I thought the idea was to not have BlobBuilder at all.
Dunno. Is there content depending on it?
Maybe some browser specific demos or content, it's not implemented by
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:48:12 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Because it's still in the current editor's draft and it's still in the
Gecko code and I was just reviewing a patch to it and saw the API? ;)
16 matches
Mail list logo
