On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:42:20 +0400, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile
cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
It's unclear what you think we should be doing differently.
Well, for instance, that when I point something out that was missed
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile
cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
It's unclear what you think we should be doing differently.
Well, for instance, that when I point something out that was missed I
am not directed to submit my feedback again, elsewhere.
--
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile
cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:21:20 +0100, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
Since when did we start putting the onus on the reviewer that her or
his feedback is captured?
Before I started working with W3C
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:49:30 +0400, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile
cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:21:20 +0100, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
Since when did we start putting the onus on the
Dear Advisory Committee representative,
This is a W3C Patent Policy Call for Exclusions for the following
Recommendation Track document:
- DOM Parsing and Serialization
(http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Parsing/),
exclusion opportunity ending on 8 February 2014 23:59 UTC
This specification
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Coralie Mercier cora...@w3.org wrote:
- DOM Parsing and Serialization
(http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Parsing/),
There were several outstanding comments against publishing and the WG
published anyway? What is going on?
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On 12/10/13 10:21 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Coralie Mercier cora...@w3.org wrote:
- DOM Parsing and Serialization
(http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Parsing/),
There were several outstanding comments against publishing and the WG
published anyway? What is
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
During the CfC, I only recall one technical comment and Travis created bug
[23936] for that comment and he noted that comment will be considered as a
`LC comment`.
It seems the technical comment about it blatantly
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:21:20 +0100, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
Anyhow, if the bug doesn't capture your concern(s), please update it.
Since when did we start putting the onus on the reviewer that
