Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-27 Thread Simon Pieters
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:52:25 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: As previously mentioned on [p-w], the test results for Web Messaging [All] indicate significant interoperability with only two tests that have less than two passes [2]. The two tests, including a short

RE: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-26 Thread Travis Leithead
Microsoft supports publishing this. Thanks to all involved! - Subject:CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28 Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:51:45 -0400 From: Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-25 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
on 25/03/2015 03:52, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: Hi, if it helps, Blink now passes those two failing tests; Chrome canary/nightly builds have the fixes included. (Fixes for http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/{008,009}.html should appear overnight also.) hth --sigbjorn Thank

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-24 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 3/24/15 3:52 PM, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: Den 3/24/2015 20:37, Arthur Barstow skreiv: On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@gmail.com wrote: 2.http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html; this test failure (which

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-24 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Den 3/24/2015 20:37, Arthur Barstow skreiv: On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@gmail.com wrote: 2.http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html; this test failure (which passes on IE) is considered an

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-21 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: 2. http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html; this test failure (which passes on IE) is considered an implementation bug (MessageChannel and MessagePort are supposed to be exposed to Worker) that is

CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
As previously mentioned on [p-w], the test results for Web Messaging [All] indicate significant interoperability with only two tests that have less than two passes [2]. The two tests, including a short analysis of the failure, are: 1. http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/with-ports/026.html;