RE: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8

2012-05-05 Thread Adrian Bateman
Microsoft supports this call. On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:26 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > During WebApps' May 1 discussion about Web Components, a proposal was > made ([1],[2]) to stop work on the XBL2 spec and this is a Call for > Consensus to do do. > > If you have any comments or concerns about t

Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8

2012-05-02 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Wed, 02 May 2012 06:26:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow wrote: During WebApps' May 1 discussion about Web Components, a proposal was made ([1],[2]) to stop work on the XBL2 spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do do. please do. cheers If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC,

Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8

2012-05-02 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Wed, 02 May 2012 19:00:48 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:35:45 -0700, Ian Hickson wrote: > What happens if it doesn't pass? I guess we'll reevaluate then. How would this be different than what we've been doing for the past y

Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8

2012-05-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > So you're blocking the resolution on Process grounds? ^_^ Not blocking anything, I am just baffled by the concept that we need to agree to tell people the truth, and by the concept that if we agree to not work on something, we have to do more work

Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8

2012-05-02 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:35:45 -0700, Ian Hickson wrote: >> > What happens if it doesn't pass? >> >> I guess we'll reevaluate then. > > How would this be different than what we've been doing for th

Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8

2012-05-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:35:45 -0700, Ian Hickson wrote: > > What happens if it doesn't pass? > > I guess we'll reevaluate then. How would this be different than what we've been doing for the past year? As far as I can tell, the current situation is

Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8

2012-05-02 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:35:45 -0700, Ian Hickson wrote: What happens if it doesn't pass? I guess we'll reevaluate then. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/

Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8

2012-05-01 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > During WebApps' May 1 discussion about Web Components, a proposal was > made ([1],[2]) to stop work on the XBL2 spec and this is a Call for > Consensus to do do. > > If this CfC passes, the spec will be republished as a WG Note (as was > done with o

CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8

2012-05-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
During WebApps' May 1 discussion about Web Components, a proposal was made ([1],[2]) to stop work on the XBL2 spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do do. If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them to public-webapps@w3.org by May 8 at the latest. Positive response