Re: Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names

2008-11-23 Thread Cameron McCormack
Maciej Stachowiak: > > I think [NativeObject] should be renamed to [Callback]. It is meant to > > be used for callback objects that have a single designated callback > > method, right? Cameron McCormack: > Not only a single callback method, perhaps multiple. But yes, it’s > pretty much for cal

Re: Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names

2008-10-05 Thread Cameron McCormack
Hi Maciej and Anne. Maciej Stachowiak: > I think [NativeObject] should be renamed to [Callback]. It is meant to > be used for callback objects that have a single designated callback > method, right? Not only a single callback method, perhaps multiple. But yes, it’s pretty much for callbacks.

Re: Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names

2008-10-03 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Oct 3, 2008, at 2:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:40:26 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think [Variadic] should be renamed [Optional]. A function may be variadic, but a parameter is optional, and this goes on the parameter. To me [Option

Re: Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names

2008-10-03 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:40:26 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think [Variadic] should be renamed [Optional]. A function may be variadic, but a parameter is optional, and this goes on the parameter. To me [Optional] does not really convey zero or more arguments very well

Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names

2008-10-02 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
I think [NativeObject] should be renamed to [Callback]. It is meant to be used for callback objects that have a single designated callback method, right? I think [Variadic] should be renamed [Optional]. A function may be variadic, but a parameter is optional, and this goes on the paramet