Andreas
Thanks, good catch.
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On May 5, 2010, at 11:41 AM, ext Andreas Kuehne wrote:
Hi all,
just a minor comment found by build a test case :
Section 7.1. Common Constraints for Signature Generation and
Validation
1. [...]
in the proposed editors draft [1] this is section 10.2 item #3
I suggest we change 3a from The URI attribute ... to be For
references that are not same-document references, the URI attribute...
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On May 5, 2010, at 11:41 AM, ext Andreas Kuehne
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Frederick Hirsch
frederick.hir...@nokia.com wrote:
in the proposed editors draft [1] this is section 10.2 item #3
I suggest we change 3a from The URI attribute ... to be For references
that are not same-document references, the URI attribute...
Done! thanks!
Hi all,
this is the official Vodafone feedback on the proposed rewriting of DigSig.
The spec looks good to us. We don't have any objection to removing the
requirement on the signer to order the signature files. Getting the validator
to do it instead is fine and is probably preferable.
Our
On May 5, 2010, at 9:40 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
Our only other comment on the specification is related to the new
requirement for the validator to support C14N11:
A validator MUST support [C14N11] to process a ds:Reference that
specifies [C14N11] as a canonicalization method.
If we
Hi all,
just a minor comment found by build a test case :
Section7.1. Common Constraints for Signature Generation and Validation
1. [...]
2. [...]
3. For each ds:Reference element:
1. The URI attribute MUST be a zip relative path
