Re: New CfC Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests

2009-05-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Lachy - this CfC has ended and my records show there were no objections. Given this, we now have a Go to prepare a Candidate Recommendation for publication. I presume the actions, that follow from the set of questions listed below, can be addressed during the Candidate period. Do you agr

Re: New CfC Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests

2009-04-14 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > So we have a new call for consensus on each of four questions: > > Should we make Erik's proposed changes[1] to the test suite? > Should we add Hixie's first test[2]? > Should we add Hixie's second test[3]? > Do we need tests as described by

New CfC Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests

2009-04-14 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
ages ago I wrote: Thanks to great work by John Resig, informative analysis by Travis, and implementatio work by many, it seems this is the case. To clarify that, this is a call for consensus on the following question: The test suite by John Resig, 2009-02-19 version[1] is a sufficient