Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
Sam Weinig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-06-17 07:34 -0700: > On Jun 17, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: >> Note that all of the Web API WG drafts are in this tree: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ >> >> And the WAF WG drafts (including Access-Control spec) are here: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ > > By which I am sure Mike meant > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/ Yep, thanks Sam.. copy/paste laziness on my part. FWIW, also note that all the HTML WG drafts are here: http://dev.w3.org/html5/ And Geolocation is here: http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/ I think the covers most of the browser API-related spec work for which we are maintaining drafts on dev.w3.org --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
On Jun 17, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: Hi Mark, You can find the editor's draft of the progress-events doc here: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html That's actually a direct link to the latest CVS source, so if/when it gets updated, it'll be immediately available there. Note that all of the Web API WG drafts are in this tree: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ And the WAF WG drafts (including Access-Control spec) are here: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ By which I am sure Mike meant http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/ Regards, --Mike -Sam
Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
Many thanks, Mike. 2008/6/17 Michael(tm) Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Mark, > > You can find the editor's draft of the progress-events doc here: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html > > That's actually a direct link to the latest CVS source, so if/when > it gets updated, it'll be immediately available there. > > Note that all of the Web API WG drafts are in this tree: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ > > And the WAF WG drafts (including Access-Control spec) are here: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ > > Regards, > > --Mike > > Mark Birbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-06-17 11:08 +0100: > >> Hi Chaals, >> >> Would you mind providing the link? I'm sure it's in an easy to find >> place, but I'm not yet familiar with the spec locations yet. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Mark >> >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Charles McCathieNevile >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > I have produced a new editor's draft [1] that incorporates a bunch of the >> > feedback I have on the Public Working Draft. It notes, rather than provides >> > a resolution for, the new (or recycled) issues I raised on defining an >> > eventType for document.createEvent and on where to define what parts of the >> > message are counted towards counting content. There are some known things >> > to >> > clean up still. >> > >> > Feedback welcome as always and should be sent to this list. >> > >> > cheers >> > >> > Chaals >> > >> > -- >> > Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group >> >je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk >> > http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Mark Birbeck, webBackplane >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck >> >> webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number >> 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, >> London, EC2A 4RR) >> > > -- > Michael(tm) Smith > http://people.w3.org/mike/ > http://sideshowbarker.net/ > -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)
Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
Hi Mark, You can find the editor's draft of the progress-events doc here: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html That's actually a direct link to the latest CVS source, so if/when it gets updated, it'll be immediately available there. Note that all of the Web API WG drafts are in this tree: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ And the WAF WG drafts (including Access-Control spec) are here: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ Regards, --Mike Mark Birbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-06-17 11:08 +0100: > Hi Chaals, > > Would you mind providing the link? I'm sure it's in an easy to find > place, but I'm not yet familiar with the spec locations yet. > > Thanks. > > Mark > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Charles McCathieNevile > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I have produced a new editor's draft [1] that incorporates a bunch of the > > feedback I have on the Public Working Draft. It notes, rather than provides > > a resolution for, the new (or recycled) issues I raised on defining an > > eventType for document.createEvent and on where to define what parts of the > > message are counted towards counting content. There are some known things to > > clean up still. > > > > Feedback welcome as always and should be sent to this list. > > > > cheers > > > > Chaals > > > > -- > > Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group > >je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk > > http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com > > > > > > > > -- > Mark Birbeck, webBackplane > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck > > webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number > 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, > London, EC2A 4RR) > -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
Hi Chaals, Would you mind providing the link? I'm sure it's in an easy to find place, but I'm not yet familiar with the spec locations yet. Thanks. Mark On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Charles McCathieNevile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have produced a new editor's draft [1] that incorporates a bunch of the > feedback I have on the Public Working Draft. It notes, rather than provides > a resolution for, the new (or recycled) issues I raised on defining an > eventType for document.createEvent and on where to define what parts of the > message are counted towards counting content. There are some known things to > clean up still. > > Feedback welcome as always and should be sent to this list. > > cheers > > Chaals > > -- > Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group >je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk > http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com > > -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)
New Progress Events editor's draft
Hi folks, I have produced a new editor's draft [1] that incorporates a bunch of the feedback I have on the Public Working Draft. It notes, rather than provides a resolution for, the new (or recycled) issues I raised on defining an eventType for document.createEvent and on where to define what parts of the message are counted towards counting content. There are some known things to clean up still. Feedback welcome as always and should be sent to this list. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
