Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

2015-06-18 Thread Aymeric Vitte
Sorry Art but the W3C disclosed the story on this list without advising us (and disclosed/archived the original email containing some private details without any authorization), we know why, it's probably understandable (although questionable), why on this list and why we should not respond here

Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

2015-06-17 Thread Aymeric Vitte
FYI, the gists have been moved (and somewhere componentized) here: http://www.peersm.com/gist1.html: Extract Widget Patent FR2962237 - Process to create an application of gadget type incorporated into a container of widget type http://www.peersm.com/gist2.html: Patent FR2962237 - Main claim,

Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

2015-06-17 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 6/17/15 5:29 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote: As directed in [1], if anyone wants to reply to this thread, please use the public-patent-issues list and do *not* reply on public-webapps. -Thank you, AB [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0912.html

Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

2015-06-15 Thread Aymeric Vitte
We have made a comparison between the Components model and the patent here: https://gist.github.com/Ayms/bf6a9f121e1ebd93cf22 From the end-2011 Components Model we have added some properties/thoughts/proposals from the patent and our past projects. Each time we read something about the

[admin] Need a list for Extract Widget patent [Was: Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent]

2015-05-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
Rigo, Wendy, Jeff - I don't think it is appropriate to use WebApps' public-webapps list regarding Web Components vs Extract Widget patent [1]. What list should be used? (FYI, Aymeric Vitte's original disclosure was forwarded to the list [1], and Aymeric's followups are [2] and [3]).

Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

2015-05-28 Thread Aymeric Vitte
Please see https://gist.github.com/Ayms/64dfd60ddae05aeaff4e This is a brief code comparison between the extract widget projects from the patent and the Polymer project. Since we knew exactly what we had to look for, we found it, the conclusion is: Not seeing obvious similitudes between the

Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

2015-05-21 Thread Aymeric Vitte
Since this is public now for everybody, please let me give some additional information. We think that the extraction mechanisms described in the patent and not covered by any spec will happen one day too, and could be integrated in the Web Components spec, the purpose being to extract a

PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

2015-05-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, For those interested in Web Components, please note I received a related e-mail titled Web Components vs Extract Widget patent. I forwarded this e-mail (which has an attachment) to the www-archive list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015May/0008.html Please do NOT