Sorry Art but the W3C disclosed the story on this list without advising
us (and disclosed/archived the original email containing some private
details without any authorization), we know why, it's probably
understandable (although questionable), why on this list and why we
should not respond here
FYI, the gists have been moved (and somewhere componentized) here:
http://www.peersm.com/gist1.html: Extract Widget Patent FR2962237 -
Process to create an application of gadget type incorporated into a
container of widget type
http://www.peersm.com/gist2.html: Patent FR2962237 - Main claim,
On 6/17/15 5:29 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
As directed in [1], if anyone wants to reply to this thread, please use
the public-patent-issues list and do *not* reply on public-webapps.
-Thank you, AB
[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0912.html
We have made a comparison between the Components model and the patent
here: https://gist.github.com/Ayms/bf6a9f121e1ebd93cf22
From the end-2011 Components Model we have added some
properties/thoughts/proposals from the patent and our past projects.
Each time we read something about the
Rigo, Wendy, Jeff - I don't think it is appropriate to use WebApps'
public-webapps list regarding Web Components vs Extract Widget patent
[1]. What list should be used?
(FYI, Aymeric Vitte's original disclosure was forwarded to the list [1],
and Aymeric's followups are [2] and [3]).
Please see https://gist.github.com/Ayms/64dfd60ddae05aeaff4e
This is a brief code comparison between the extract widget projects from
the patent and the Polymer project.
Since we knew exactly what we had to look for, we found it, the
conclusion is:
Not seeing obvious similitudes between the
Since this is public now for everybody, please let me give some
additional information.
We think that the extraction mechanisms described in the patent and not
covered by any spec will happen one day too, and could be integrated in
the Web Components spec, the purpose being to extract a
Hi All,
For those interested in Web Components, please note I received a related
e-mail titled Web Components vs Extract Widget patent. I forwarded
this e-mail (which has an attachment) to the www-archive list:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015May/0008.html
Please do NOT