.
-Original Message-
From: Travis Leithead
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 11:49 AM
To: 'Arthur Barstow'; Ryosuke Niwa
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: RE: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink
I've posted the notice on the editor's draft as suggested below. If there is
help
Subject: Re: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink
On 5/28/15 2:04 PM, Travis Leithead wrote:
That sounds good to me (working the UI challenges for IME together with
grammar/spell checking). Is this a direction the current IME spec could
take--possibly with a big refactor
] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink
On May 27, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I believed the use-cases for avoiding UI clashes between site-driven
auto-complete lists and IME auto-complete boxes is still a valid use case, and
I think the spec
Subject: Re: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink
On May 27, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I believed the use-cases for avoiding UI clashes between site-driven
auto-complete lists and IME auto-complete boxes is still a valid use
On May 27, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I believed the use-cases for avoiding UI clashes between site-driven
auto-complete lists and IME auto-complete boxes is still a valid use case,
and I think the spec is still valid to try to push to