Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3)

2009-12-15 Thread Robin Berjon
Hi Larry, On Dec 9, 2009, at 19:08 , Larry Masinter wrote: Your reference to 'every drive-by you should use this! argument' is mainly irrelevant to my comment and I assume your goal was to be insulting, alluding to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-by_shooting -- unless you have some other

Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3)

2009-12-15 Thread timeless
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote: The term drive-by comment is one made against a specification in passing without the diligence and conscientiousness to participate in the follow-up discussion; and typically to then re-iterate it later. I believe that the

RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3)

2009-12-09 Thread Larry Masinter
AM To: Larry Masinter Cc: public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3) Dear Larry, thank you for your comments. On Oct 10, 2009, at 19:44 , Larry Masinter wrote: 3) ** Reuse URI schemes ** http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-scheme includes Good practice

Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3)

2009-11-19 Thread Robin Berjon
Dear Larry, thank you for your comments. On Oct 10, 2009, at 19:44 , Larry Masinter wrote: 3) ** Reuse URI schemes ** http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-scheme includes Good practice: Reuse URI schemes A specification SHOULD reuse an existing URI scheme (rather than create a new one)