RE: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans

2013-10-12 Thread Feras Moussa

 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:47:23 -0400
 From: art.bars...@nokia.com
 To: tyosh...@google.com; feras.mou...@hotmail.com
 CC: public-webapps@w3.org
 Subject: Re: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans

 On 10/11/13 8:05 AM, ext Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Feras Moussa
 feras.mou...@hotmail.com mailto:feras.mou...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Apologies for the delay, I had broken one of my mail rules and
 didn't see this initially.

 Asymeric is correct - there have been a few threads and revisions.
 A more up-to-date version is the one Asymeric linked -
 http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tyoshino/stream/blob/master/streams.html
 The above version incorporates both promises and streams and is a
 more refined version of Streams.

 From other threads on Stream, it became apparent that there were a
 few pieces of the current Streams API ED that were designed around
 older paradigms and needed refining to be better aligned with
 current APIs. I think it does not make sense to have two
 different specs, and instead have a combined one that we move
 forward.

 I can work with Takeshi on getting his version incorporated into
 the Streams ED, which we can then move forward with.


 I'm happy to.

 OK, thanks Feras and Takeshi. Re PubStatus, I added Taekshi as an Editor
 and update the Plan to reflect the impending integration.

 I think it would be helpful if Feras' spec was updated as soon as
 possible to clearly state the intent to integrate Takeshi's spec.

 -Thanks, Art





The spec has been updated with a note clarifying the state. I will work with 
Takeshi on getting the ED updated accordingly.

Thanks, 
Feras 


Re: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans

2013-10-11 Thread Takeshi Yoshino
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Feras Moussa feras.mou...@hotmail.comwrote:

 Apologies for the delay, I had broken one of my mail rules and didn't see
 this initially.

 Asymeric is correct - there have been a few threads and revisions. A more
 up-to-date version is the one Asymeric linked -
 http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tyoshino/stream/blob/master/streams.html
 The above version incorporates both promises and streams and is a more
 refined version of Streams.

 From other threads on Stream, it became apparent that there were a few
 pieces of the current Streams API ED that were designed around older
 paradigms and needed refining to be better aligned with current APIs.  I
 think it does not make sense to have two different specs, and instead have
 a combined one that we move forward.

 I can work with Takeshi on getting his version incorporated into the
 Streams ED, which we can then move forward with.


I'm happy to.



 Thanks,
 Feras


  Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:32:20 -0400
  From: art.bars...@nokia.com
  To: vitteayme...@gmail.com; feras.mou...@hotmail.com;
 tyosh...@google.com
  CC: public-webapps@w3.org
  Subject: Re: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans
 
  On 10/10/13 6:26 AM, ext Aymeric Vitte wrote:
  I think the plan should be more here now:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/0049.html
 
  There are indeed at least two specs here:
 
  [1] Feras' https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm
 
 
  [2] Takeshi's
  
 http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tyoshino/stream/blob/master/streams.html
 
 
  Among the Qs I have here are ...
 
  * What is the implementation status of these specs?


There's a Blink intent-to-implement for Streams API I sent. I plan to
implement it based on [2]. By turning on a flag to turn on experimental
features, XHR in Chrome can return a response as a Stream object. It's
based on 10. Extension of XMLHttpRequest of [1]. Nothing done yet for the
rest. We're preparing for it (such as implementation of Promises).

I agree that we should merge [1] and [2] as Feras said.


Re: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans

2013-10-11 Thread Arthur Barstow

On 10/11/13 8:05 AM, ext Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Feras Moussa 
feras.mou...@hotmail.com mailto:feras.mou...@hotmail.com wrote:


Apologies for the delay, I had broken one of my mail rules and
didn't see this initially.

Asymeric is correct - there have been a few threads and revisions.
A more up-to-date version is the one Asymeric linked -

http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tyoshino/stream/blob/master/streams.html
The above version incorporates both promises and streams and is a
more refined version of Streams.

From other threads on Stream, it became apparent that there were a
few pieces of the current Streams API ED that were designed around
older paradigms and needed refining to be better aligned with
current APIs.  I think it does not make sense to have two
different specs, and instead have a combined one that we move
forward.

I can work with Takeshi on getting his version incorporated into
the Streams ED, which we can then move forward with.


I'm happy to.


OK, thanks Feras and Takeshi. Re PubStatus, I added Taekshi as an Editor 
and update the Plan to reflect the impending integration.


I think it would be helpful if Feras' spec was updated as soon as 
possible to clearly state the intent to integrate Takeshi's spec.


-Thanks, Art






Re: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans

2013-10-10 Thread Aymeric Vitte
I think the plan should be more here now: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/0049.html


Regards

Aymeric

Le 02/10/2013 18:32, Arthur Barstow a écrit :

Hi Feras,

If any of the data for the Streams API spec in [PubStatus] is not 
accurate, please provide corrections.


Also, please see the following thread and let us know your plan for 
this spec 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JulSep/0599.html.


-Thanks, ArtB

[PubStatus] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus



--
Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms




Re: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans

2013-10-10 Thread Arthur Barstow

On 10/10/13 6:26 AM, ext Aymeric Vitte wrote:
I think the plan should be more here now: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/0049.html


There are indeed at least two specs here:

[1] Feras' https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm

[2] Takeshi's 
http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tyoshino/stream/blob/master/streams.html


Among the Qs I have here are ...

* What is the implementation status of these specs?

* Would it make sense or be useful to merge or layer the specs, or 
should we only work on one of these specs?


* Who favors WebApps stopping work on [1] and starting work on [2]?

* Would anyone object to WebApps stopped working on [1]? If yes, are you 
willing to help lead the effort to move Feras' spec forward?


* Takeshi - I noticed you are not a member of WebApps. Are you willing 
to work on [2] within the context of WebApps?


-Thanks, AB




Regards

Aymeric

Le 02/10/2013 18:32, Arthur Barstow a écrit :

Hi Feras,

If any of the data for the Streams API spec in [PubStatus] is not 
accurate, please provide corrections.


Also, please see the following thread and let us know your plan for 
this spec 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JulSep/0599.html.


-Thanks, ArtB

[PubStatus] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus








RE: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans

2013-10-10 Thread Feras Moussa
Apologies for the delay, I had broken one of my mail rules and didn't see this 
initially.

Asymeric is correct - there have been a few threads and revisions. A more 
up-to-date version is the one Asymeric linked - 
http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tyoshino/stream/blob/master/streams.html
The above version incorporates both promises and streams and is a more refined 
version of Streams. 

From other threads on Stream, it became apparent that there were a few pieces 
of the current Streams API ED that were designed around older paradigms and 
needed refining to be better aligned with current APIs.  I think it does not 
make sense to have two different specs, and instead have a combined one that 
we move forward. 

I can work with Takeshi on getting his version incorporated into the Streams 
ED, which we can then move forward with.

Thanks,
Feras


 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:32:20 -0400
 From: art.bars...@nokia.com
 To: vitteayme...@gmail.com; feras.mou...@hotmail.com; tyosh...@google.com
 CC: public-webapps@w3.org
 Subject: Re: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans
 
 On 10/10/13 6:26 AM, ext Aymeric Vitte wrote:
 I think the plan should be more here now: 
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/0049.html
 
 There are indeed at least two specs here:
 
 [1] Feras' https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm
 
 [2] Takeshi's 
 http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tyoshino/stream/blob/master/streams.html
 
 Among the Qs I have here are ...
 
 * What is the implementation status of these specs?
 
 * Would it make sense or be useful to merge or layer the specs, or 
 should we only work on one of these specs?
 
 * Who favors WebApps stopping work on [1] and starting work on [2]?
 
 * Would anyone object to WebApps stopped working on [1]? If yes, are you 
 willing to help lead the effort to move Feras' spec forward?
 
 * Takeshi - I noticed you are not a member of WebApps. Are you willing 
 to work on [2] within the context of WebApps?
 
 -Thanks, AB
 
 

 Regards

 Aymeric

 Le 02/10/2013 18:32, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
 Hi Feras,

 If any of the data for the Streams API spec in [PubStatus] is not 
 accurate, please provide corrections.

 Also, please see the following thread and let us know your plan for 
 this spec 
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JulSep/0599.html.

 -Thanks, ArtB

 [PubStatus] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus