RE: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17

2010-08-11 Thread Pablo Castro
We support this as well.

-pablo


-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 8:06 AM
To: Jeremy Orlow
Cc: art.bars...@nokia.com; public-webapps
Subject: Re: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17

I support this.

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Jeremy Orlow  wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Arthur Barstow 
> wrote:
>>
>> All - the Editors of the Indexed Database API would like to publish a new
>> Working Draft:
>>
>>  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
>>
>> If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them
>> to public-webapps by August 10 at the latest.
>
> I assume you mean the 17th?
>>
>> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and
>> silence will be assumed to be assent.
>
> We support.





Re: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17

2010-08-10 Thread Jonas Sicking
I support this.

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Jeremy Orlow  wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Arthur Barstow 
> wrote:
>>
>> All - the Editors of the Indexed Database API would like to publish a new
>> Working Draft:
>>
>>  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
>>
>> If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them
>> to public-webapps by August 10 at the latest.
>
> I assume you mean the 17th?
>>
>> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and
>> silence will be assumed to be assent.
>
> We support.



Re: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17

2010-08-10 Thread Kris Zyp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
 
Any chance #10304 could be resolved prior to the publishing? Seems
like it would be nice to get a change to the core store API sooner
rather than later. Either way, I am +1 for publishing though.
Thanks,
Kris

On 8/10/2010 5:04 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> All - the Editors of the Indexed Database API would like to publish
> a new Working Draft:
>
>   http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please
> send them to public-webapps by August 10 at the latest.
>
> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
> encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent.
>
> -Art Barstow
>
>

- -- 
Kris Zyp
SitePen
(503) 806-1841
http://sitepen.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
iEYEARECAAYFAkxhVu4ACgkQ9VpNnHc4zAyHygCfU1nLMK8WLnG1FETtaOtbpLDn
nxgAnAxoTdIwTx22NCJPrE5l9jeC4PJS
=8p1i
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17

2010-08-10 Thread Arthur Barstow

Yes, the deadline for comments is August 17!

On 8/10/10 7:38 AM, ext Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Arthur Barstow 
mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com>> wrote:


All - the Editors of the Indexed Database API would like to
publish a new Working Draft:

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please
send them to public-webapps by August 10 at the latest.


I assume you mean the 17th?

As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent.


We support.




Re: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17

2010-08-10 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> All - the Editors of the Indexed Database API would like to publish a new
> Working Draft:
>
>  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them
> to public-webapps by August 10 at the latest.
>

I assume you mean the 17th?

As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and
> silence will be assumed to be assent.
>

We support.